Helideck foam sample

  • Safety Flash
  • Published on 3 January 2005
  • Generated on 13 December 2024
  • IMCA SF 01/05
  • 2 minute read

Further to information provided in information note Firefighting foam on helidecks, we have been provided with the following information arising from a foam sample test onboard a vessel with a helideck.

The company reports that the results from a sample from the helideck foam monitor tank submitted for testing were perplexing. They stated that the foam had a very high concentration of water, as opposed to 0%.

What were the causes?

Investigations were carried out onboard to comprehend this high concentration of water in the foam sample. After various tests it was concluded that the non-return valve located between the foam tank and pipework from the pump to the helideck foam monitor had been leaking.

This was not immediately noticed. However, the consequences of this could have been devastating – should a helicopter fire on the helideck have occurred, the vessel would have been using a mixture of foam concentrate and water which was incapable of producing the required blanket of foam.

Actions

The company concerned has instructed its helideck-equipped vessels to take the following measures to prevent recurrence of this:

  • Where possible, test non-return valves for leakage.

  • Enter the non-return valve item into the vessel’s planned maintenance system for inspection and testing on a frequent basis when convenient.

  • Schedule to fit an isolation valve between the foam tank and non-return valve.

Latest Safety Flashes:

LTI: Finger injury during emergency recovery of ROV

A worker suffered a serious finger injury when their finger was caught between a crane wire and the recovery hook on an ROV.

Read more
BSEE: recurring hand injuries from alternative cutting devices

The United States Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE) has published Safety Alert 487.

Read more
NTSB: Crane wire failure

The National Transportation Safety Board of the United States (NTSB) published "Safer Seas Digest 2023".

Read more
Hot work performed outside of Permit to Work (PTW) boundary limit

A near miss occurred when a third-party contractor working removed a trip hazard from the vessel main deck, using a cutting torch and grinding disc.

Read more
Vital safety information (height of vehicle) found incorrect

“Height of vehicle” information displayed on a truck, was found to be incorrect.

Read more

IMCA Safety Flashes summarise key safety matters and incidents, allowing lessons to be more easily learnt for the benefit of the entire offshore industry.

The effectiveness of the IMCA Safety Flash system depends on the industry sharing information and so avoiding repeat incidents. Incidents are classified according to IOGP's Life Saving Rules.

All information is anonymised or sanitised, as appropriate, and warnings for graphic content included where possible.

IMCA makes every effort to ensure both the accuracy and reliability of the information shared, but is not be liable for any guidance and/or recommendation and/or statement herein contained.

The information contained in this document does not fulfil or replace any individual's or Member's legal, regulatory or other duties or obligations in respect of their operations. Individuals and Members remain solely responsible for the safe, lawful and proper conduct of their operations.

Share your safety incidents with IMCA online. Sign-up to receive Safety Flashes straight to your email.