High potential near-miss: Dropped object

  • Safety Flash
  • Published on 15 January 2016
  • Generated on 12 December 2024
  • IMCA SF 02/16
  • 3 minute read

A member has reported a high potential near miss incident in which an object of 1.24 kg fell 36m.

What happened?

The incident occurred during removal of tensioner pad upper castings on a tiltable pipelay system. This equipment had two levels of tensioners called the upper and lower tensioners. Each level of the tensioner comprised a total of 384 pads, conducted on 4 rotating chains. The crew had been tasked with removing the upper tensioner pad upper castings, as these were required to be removed so that they could be sent away for machining. The task involved removing and refitting pads and casting to a total weight of approximately 27te. These were manually placed into the pad baskets suspended on the rear of the tensioner platform.

During the removal of a tensioner pad upper casting on track 4 of the upper tensioner section, one of the PU (polyurethane) blocks (there were three PU blocks per pad configuration) slipped out upon removal and fell between the track guide, falling approximately 36m to the deck below. No personnel were nearby at the time; the nearest person was 10-15m away. Had the PU block (which weighed 1.241kg and fell 36m) hit someone, the outcome had the potential to result in a fatality.

Tensioner pad diagram

Tensioner pad diagram

In situ showing actual size

In situ showing actual size

Photograph of worksite

Photograph of worksite

Our member noted the following:

  • This was scheduled to be carried out by personnel from the supplier of the pipelay system, but owing to manpower issues, vessel personnel carried out the task.
  • This was the first time that vessel personnel had carried out this task on the pipelay system. 80 of the 96 castings had been safely removed at the time of the incident.
  • One shift carried out this task with the track ‘paying out’ so that there would always be a pad assembly underneath the work area (until the last casting has to be moved), significantly reducing the potential for a dropped object. This was not communicated to the other shift.
  • The PU block landed on the deck outside of the safety barriers put in place for this task and finally came to rest approximately 7m away from where it first landed.
  • This task was strenuous, ergonomically challenging and with manual handling problems that arose as the work progressed, resulting in several missed opportunities for an intervention to be made and failures to stop the job.

Our member made the following initial observations on the causes of the incident (subject to further investigation):

  • There was no control of work – no permit to work, no risk assessment.
  • There was inadequate job planning and a lack of knowledge of the task.
  • There was poor hazard awareness and poor risk perception of the task.
  • There were inadequate communications between crew at shift handover.
  • The design of the barrier handrail and the weight of the castings makes this task difficult for the workforce. A review has been conducted with the manufacturer of this equipment with regard to changing the layout of the barriers.
  • Procedures for this task were still in draft.
  • There was a failure to stop the job.
Before incident

Before incident – The initial setup of temporary timber designed to prevent objects dropping. However, once the upper casting is removed, there is a gap sufficient for an object to fall in between the tracks

After incident

After incident – Additional timber put in place to prevent further dropped objects

Dropped objects were the most common single subject of reported IMCA Safety Flash incidents during 2015. It would be beneficial for members to bring this topic once again to the attention of vessel crews, to drive home the lessons that are clearly not yet being learnt. Members are reminded of IMCA safety promotional material as follows:

Latest Safety Flashes:

LTI: Finger injury during emergency recovery of ROV

A worker suffered a serious finger injury when their finger was caught between a crane wire and the recovery hook on an ROV.

Read more
BSEE: recurring hand injuries from alternative cutting devices

The United States Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE) has published Safety Alert 487.

Read more
NTSB: Crane wire failure

The National Transportation Safety Board of the United States (NTSB) published "Safer Seas Digest 2023".

Read more
Hot work performed outside of Permit to Work (PTW) boundary limit

A near miss occurred when a third-party contractor working removed a trip hazard from the vessel main deck, using a cutting torch and grinding disc.

Read more
Vital safety information (height of vehicle) found incorrect

“Height of vehicle” information displayed on a truck, was found to be incorrect.

Read more

IMCA Safety Flashes summarise key safety matters and incidents, allowing lessons to be more easily learnt for the benefit of the entire offshore industry.

The effectiveness of the IMCA Safety Flash system depends on the industry sharing information and so avoiding repeat incidents. Incidents are classified according to IOGP's Life Saving Rules.

All information is anonymised or sanitised, as appropriate, and warnings for graphic content included where possible.

IMCA makes every effort to ensure both the accuracy and reliability of the information shared, but is not be liable for any guidance and/or recommendation and/or statement herein contained.

The information contained in this document does not fulfil or replace any individual's or Member's legal, regulatory or other duties or obligations in respect of their operations. Individuals and Members remain solely responsible for the safe, lawful and proper conduct of their operations.

Share your safety incidents with IMCA online. Sign-up to receive Safety Flashes straight to your email.