Two incidents relating to the condition of personal protective equipment

  • Safety Flash
  • Published on 2 February 2021
  • Generated on 13 December 2024
  • IMCA SF 04/21
  • 3 minute read

Two incidents are reported by different contractors, relating to the condition of personal protective equipment.

Incident 1: Defective Safety Harness

What happened?

During a site visit, a third-party owned safety harness was found inside a container of the barge.

The harness was without the manufacturer’s tag and with cargo D-shackles on the lanyard instead of proper carabiners.

The safety harness could potentially have been used, posing risk to the crew members who used it.

The safety harness was immediately taken out of service.

During a barge inspection, a third-party owned safety harness was found inside a container, without manufacturer’s tag and with cargo D-shackles on the lanyard instead of proper carabiners

Causes

  • Ineffective checks on safety harnesses.

  • Crew members did not quarantine or properly label defective safety harness.

  • There was no designated quarantine space on the barge.

Recommendations

  • Crew on board reminded of the need for regular inspection of the safety harnesses.

  • Defective safety harness removed from use immediately – remove and quarantine any defective equipment immediately. Any doubt at all about the safety of the equipment, don’t use it!

  • Dedicated quarantine spaces (boxes) for defective equipment and tools to be arranged on board barges.

Incident 2: Safety helmet found to be several years past its storage life expiry date

What happened?

While cleaning a storage cabinet onboard a vessel, a safety helmet retained for use by visitors was found to be several years past its storage life expiry date.

This prompted the inspection of all in-use and stored/spare safety helmets onboard the vessel.

The inspection identified five helmets which were past their recommended in-use life and three helmets past their storage life.

Several safety helmet suspension systems were also found to be defective – faulty ratchet adjusters and torn webbing.

An inspection on onboard another vessel working on the same project also found several out of date and defective safety helmets.

While cleaning a storage cabinet onboard a vessel, a safety helmet retained for use by visitors was found to be several years past its storage life expiry date

Image courtesy of https://simplifiedsafety.co.uk

 

Lessons learned

  • Safety helmets don’t last forever – remember it’s your head and your life the helmet protects!

  • There was inadequate management of in-use and stored safety helmets resulted in safety helmets which had exceeded their storage/in-use life, and/or were defective, still being available for use.

  • A standard/conventional safety helmet consists of two components – the shell and the suspension – which work together as a system. When in-use both components require periodic inspection and maintenance in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. Lack of familiarisation training in the inspection, use and storage of safety helmets can lead to defects not being identified or reported.

Actions

  • Members are encouraged to check the procurement, storage and use of safety helmets.

  • The storage-life and in-use life of a safety helmet is determined by the manufacture and whilst only a recommendation, should be followed.

  • Spare safety helmets should be stored in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. Exceeding the storage life will reduce its in-use life accordingly. Stock levels should be kept to a minimum and storage conditions monitored.

  • When not being worn, in-use safety helmets should be stored safely and protected from damage.

Latest Safety Flashes:

LTI: Finger injury during emergency recovery of ROV

A worker suffered a serious finger injury when their finger was caught between a crane wire and the recovery hook on an ROV.

Read more
BSEE: recurring hand injuries from alternative cutting devices

The United States Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE) has published Safety Alert 487.

Read more
NTSB: Crane wire failure

The National Transportation Safety Board of the United States (NTSB) published "Safer Seas Digest 2023".

Read more
Hot work performed outside of Permit to Work (PTW) boundary limit

A near miss occurred when a third-party contractor working removed a trip hazard from the vessel main deck, using a cutting torch and grinding disc.

Read more
Vital safety information (height of vehicle) found incorrect

“Height of vehicle” information displayed on a truck, was found to be incorrect.

Read more

IMCA Safety Flashes summarise key safety matters and incidents, allowing lessons to be more easily learnt for the benefit of the entire offshore industry.

The effectiveness of the IMCA Safety Flash system depends on the industry sharing information and so avoiding repeat incidents. Incidents are classified according to IOGP's Life Saving Rules.

All information is anonymised or sanitised, as appropriate, and warnings for graphic content included where possible.

IMCA makes every effort to ensure both the accuracy and reliability of the information shared, but is not be liable for any guidance and/or recommendation and/or statement herein contained.

The information contained in this document does not fulfil or replace any individual's or Member's legal, regulatory or other duties or obligations in respect of their operations. Individuals and Members remain solely responsible for the safe, lawful and proper conduct of their operations.

Share your safety incidents with IMCA online. Sign-up to receive Safety Flashes straight to your email.