Joystick controls

  • Safety Flash
  • Published on 1 July 1999
  • Generated on 13 December 2024
  • IMCA SF 04/99
  • 2 minute read

We have received the following information from one of our members, where that member’s vessel suffered a loss of joystick control for no apparent reason, whilst working alongside a rig with a bulk hose connected.

Our member’s investigation revealed the following:

The joystick manufacturer’s engineer visited the vessel, as soon as it returned to port and thoroughly checked out the joystick panel, finding no reason for the failure in the process. Current thinking is that a radio signal caused the control failure. This is not an unknown effect, as another of their vessels found that transmissions from a small UVF portable radio caused the same type of failure. When the portable radio’s aerial was removed, the effect disappeared. Portable telephones are also known to have similar effects on the control equipment.

Recommendations

The member advised that persons should be aware of this potential problem and that, when working alongside an installation, a quick, clean changeover to manual control can be affected before the vessel loses position, should a similar incident occur. They advise that it would also be prudent to practise regular changeover drills, from joystick to manual, if anyone does not already include this as part of a ship’s regular, emergency exercises. The problem does not appear to be specific to any single manufacturer, so they advise that everyone should be made aware of this problem.

Latest Safety Flashes:

LTI: Finger injury during emergency recovery of ROV

A worker suffered a serious finger injury when their finger was caught between a crane wire and the recovery hook on an ROV.

Read more
BSEE: recurring hand injuries from alternative cutting devices

The United States Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE) has published Safety Alert 487.

Read more
NTSB: Crane wire failure

The National Transportation Safety Board of the United States (NTSB) published "Safer Seas Digest 2023".

Read more
Hot work performed outside of Permit to Work (PTW) boundary limit

A near miss occurred when a third-party contractor working removed a trip hazard from the vessel main deck, using a cutting torch and grinding disc.

Read more
Vital safety information (height of vehicle) found incorrect

“Height of vehicle” information displayed on a truck, was found to be incorrect.

Read more

IMCA Safety Flashes summarise key safety matters and incidents, allowing lessons to be more easily learnt for the benefit of the entire offshore industry.

The effectiveness of the IMCA Safety Flash system depends on the industry sharing information and so avoiding repeat incidents. Incidents are classified according to IOGP's Life Saving Rules.

All information is anonymised or sanitised, as appropriate, and warnings for graphic content included where possible.

IMCA makes every effort to ensure both the accuracy and reliability of the information shared, but is not be liable for any guidance and/or recommendation and/or statement herein contained.

The information contained in this document does not fulfil or replace any individual's or Member's legal, regulatory or other duties or obligations in respect of their operations. Individuals and Members remain solely responsible for the safe, lawful and proper conduct of their operations.

Share your safety incidents with IMCA online. Sign-up to receive Safety Flashes straight to your email.