Hydraulic injury to hand

  • Safety Flash
  • Published on 1 October 2000
  • Generated on 5 December 2024
  • IMCA SF 06/00
  • 2 minute read

Work was being undertaken servicing an engine. Immediately prior to the accident the first cylinder head had been removed using the equipment and procedures normally used for this task. 

What happened?

The hydraulic power tool for tensioning the main retaining bolts (regulated at 500 bar) was applied and pressured up to 490 bar. The injured person’s left hand was on the body of the jack. As he slackened the main nut on the tensioned bolt a small release of HP oil was injected into his left hand.

The cause of the release was the failure of an HP seal on the hydraulic jack that allowed a high velocity discharge of a small quantity of hydraulic oil to be released through a small aperture. The failure was attributed to a missing backup ‘o’-ring seal. Even though the injured person was wearing PPE, the jet of oil penetrated his left hand.

The reason for the missing backup ‘o’-ring could not be established. It was either omitted by the manufacturer or during maintenance. The risk assessment that was carried out did not identify that high pressure could be contained within the jack.

The company involved has identified the following:

  • The need for a specific procedure regarding the changing of seal/’o’-ring assemblies.
  • Investigation and availability of gloves that provide additional protection against equipment that may involve high pressure hazards.
  • Hydraulic jacks should be included on planned maintenance system.
  • Additional PPE (full face visors) to be worn while performing this task in future.

Latest Safety Flashes:

LTI: Finger injury during emergency recovery of ROV

A worker suffered a serious finger injury when their finger was caught between a crane wire and the recovery hook on an ROV.

Read more
BSEE: recurring hand injuries from alternative cutting devices

The United States Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE) has published Safety Alert 487.

Read more
NTSB: Crane wire failure

The National Transportation Safety Board of the United States (NTSB) published "Safer Seas Digest 2023".

Read more
Hot work performed outside of Permit to Work (PTW) boundary limit

A near miss occurred when a third-party contractor working removed a trip hazard from the vessel main deck, using a cutting torch and grinding disc.

Read more
Vital safety information (height of vehicle) found incorrect

“Height of vehicle” information displayed on a truck, was found to be incorrect.

Read more

IMCA Safety Flashes summarise key safety matters and incidents, allowing lessons to be more easily learnt for the benefit of the entire offshore industry.

The effectiveness of the IMCA Safety Flash system depends on the industry sharing information and so avoiding repeat incidents. Incidents are classified according to IOGP's Life Saving Rules.

All information is anonymised or sanitised, as appropriate, and warnings for graphic content included where possible.

IMCA makes every effort to ensure both the accuracy and reliability of the information shared, but is not be liable for any guidance and/or recommendation and/or statement herein contained.

The information contained in this document does not fulfil or replace any individual's or Member's legal, regulatory or other duties or obligations in respect of their operations. Individuals and Members remain solely responsible for the safe, lawful and proper conduct of their operations.

Share your safety incidents with IMCA online. Sign-up to receive Safety Flashes straight to your email.