Automatic control – navigation problem

  • Safety Flash
  • Published on 1 November 1999
  • Generated on 12 December 2024
  • IMCA SF 06/99
  • 2 minute read

We have recently had reported to us this near-miss concerning an ROV support vessel and an unmanned installation.

What happened?

The vessel was operating under automatic control with the platform selected in the outboard navigation computer as the target destination.

On approaching the 500m zone, the on-shift Chief Officer commenced operations to position the vessel outside the 500m zone for field arrival trials.

However, as a result of his omission to deselect automatic control, the vessel failed to respond as he had expected and continued into the platform 500m zone at a speed of between three and six knots.

The Vessel Master, who was also on the bridge, realised that the automatic control had not been deselected. He changed to manual mode and stopped the vessel short of the platform.

The vessel is reported to have come within 10-60m of the structure.

Following the incident, the vessel departed the 500m zone and satisfactorily completed standard field arrival trials prior to starting DP operations.

The company involved has noted that the incident, which occurred on the UKCS, occurred as a result of the failure to comply with UKOOA’s “Guidelines for the Safe Operation of Offshore Support Vessels”, Section 3 “Way Points”, compounded by operator error. A number of corrective actions have been taken by the company to prevent recurrence of this situation.

Latest Safety Flashes:

LTI: Finger injury during emergency recovery of ROV

A worker suffered a serious finger injury when their finger was caught between a crane wire and the recovery hook on an ROV.

Read more
BSEE: recurring hand injuries from alternative cutting devices

The United States Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE) has published Safety Alert 487.

Read more
NTSB: Crane wire failure

The National Transportation Safety Board of the United States (NTSB) published "Safer Seas Digest 2023".

Read more
Hot work performed outside of Permit to Work (PTW) boundary limit

A near miss occurred when a third-party contractor working removed a trip hazard from the vessel main deck, using a cutting torch and grinding disc.

Read more
Vital safety information (height of vehicle) found incorrect

“Height of vehicle” information displayed on a truck, was found to be incorrect.

Read more

IMCA Safety Flashes summarise key safety matters and incidents, allowing lessons to be more easily learnt for the benefit of the entire offshore industry.

The effectiveness of the IMCA Safety Flash system depends on the industry sharing information and so avoiding repeat incidents. Incidents are classified according to IOGP's Life Saving Rules.

All information is anonymised or sanitised, as appropriate, and warnings for graphic content included where possible.

IMCA makes every effort to ensure both the accuracy and reliability of the information shared, but is not be liable for any guidance and/or recommendation and/or statement herein contained.

The information contained in this document does not fulfil or replace any individual's or Member's legal, regulatory or other duties or obligations in respect of their operations. Individuals and Members remain solely responsible for the safe, lawful and proper conduct of their operations.

Share your safety incidents with IMCA online. Sign-up to receive Safety Flashes straight to your email.