Near-miss: Mooring without port assistance

  • Safety Flash
  • Published on 31 March 2016
  • Generated on 14 November 2025
  • IMCA SF 07/16
  • 2 minute read

A member has reported several incidents in which a shored-based mooring gang was not made available when a vessel arrived for a regular call at a designated berth.

What happened?

Rather than stop the job, the vessel crews had adopted an unacceptable ‘routine’ of jumping between the vessel and the jetty to conduct the mooring on their own. A third-party assurance official was recently aboard and witnessed this behaviour – he immediately exercised the stop work policy and communicated a near miss report.

Investigation revealed the following:

  • Neither the client nor the port authority were planning and preparing adequate support for vessel mooring operations.
  • Everyone onboard had become complacent and accepting of a non-compliant, unsafe practice resulting in multiple exposures to the risk of falling overboard.
  • Although some vessel crew had raised some safety observations about this situation, no one had elevated their concerns to shore-side management or raised a near miss report.
  • The stop work policy was not being implemented by the crew – it took a visiting third party to identify the hazardous occurrence, put a stop to it, and report it to the office.

Summary of actions taken:

  • The client was informed immediately. The client provided feedback with acceptance and commitment to addressing the issue to ensure it did not happen again.
  • Shore-based management have strongly engaged the client and port authority – the vessel has since called at the berth on several occasions and mooring gangs have been present for all mooring and unmooring operations.
  • A company regional director immediately conducted a vessel visit to engage with the Master and crew to discuss the incident.

Our member notes that when crew members draw attention to unsafe acts or unsafe conditions, or any hazardous occurrences, these should be brought to the knowledge of shipboard management and action should be taken – it is not acceptable to ignore these or do nothing.

Members’ attention is drawn to:

Latest Safety Flashes:

Bunker hose obstructing emergency exit

A bunker hose was discovered routed in a way that partially obstructed the stern emergency exit hatch.

Read more
Watertight door and emergency hatch found open at sea

Watertight doors and an emergency hatch were observed open in the ER (Engine Room) during an offshore audit.

Read more
ATSB: Undocumented modification contributed to steam burns

An unplanned pressure release resulted in burn injuries to three crew members.

Read more
Smoke in the battery room

Smoke was observed in the battery room of a vessel alongside.

Read more
Hull crack arising from vibration

A small vessel built of aluminium experienced vibration coming from the propeller.

Read more

IMCA Safety Flashes summarise key safety matters and incidents, allowing lessons to be more easily learnt for the benefit of the entire offshore industry.

The effectiveness of the IMCA Safety Flash system depends on the industry sharing information and so avoiding repeat incidents. Incidents are classified according to IOGP's Life Saving Rules.

All information is anonymised or sanitised, as appropriate, and warnings for graphic content included where possible.

IMCA makes every effort to ensure both the accuracy and reliability of the information shared, but is not be liable for any guidance and/or recommendation and/or statement herein contained.

The information contained in this document does not fulfil or replace any individual's or Member's legal, regulatory or other duties or obligations in respect of their operations. Individuals and Members remain solely responsible for the safe, lawful and proper conduct of their operations.

Share your safety incidents with IMCA online. Sign-up to receive Safety Flashes straight to your email.