Electrical isolation: Failing to “prove dead” at the point of work

  • Safety Flash
  • Published on 16 May 2025
  • Generated on 11 April 2026
  • IMCA SF 09/25
  • 2 minute read

One of our members discovered that some personnel and worksites were not following the intent of their own company electrical isolation protocols.

What happened?

The principle of “proving dead” when working on electrical equipment, was not being followed at the point of work, at some worksites.

It was discovered some worksites are not proving dead at the point of work, only at the point of isolation, which can often be remote from the intended point of work. This increases the risk of serious injury or fatality due to potential errors occurring between the point of isolation and the intended workplace, and result in personnel inadvertently approaching an active system.

Example 1:

Isolating a vessel thruster (#6) at the main High Voltage (HV) switchboard. Proving dead at the switchboard and earthing at the switchboard, an engineer then goes to the point of work but does not “prove dead” the equipment to be worked upon. The engineer intended to go to thruster 6, but in fact went to thruster 7. Result: direct access and contact with live terminals.

Example 2:

An ROV technician isolated the port Remotely Operated Vehicle (ROV) at the Power Distribution Unit (PDU) and applied an earthing spider at the HV termination box. ROV technician then started work on the starboard ROV. Result: direct access and contact with live terminals.

Lesson learned

·       Crew members may inadvertently expose themselves to risk by failing to follow “proving dead” protocols at the point of work. Both of these events could easily have lead to serious injury or death.

·       Take the time to prove equipment dead at the worksite, at the actual point of work.

Members may wish to refer to

Latest Safety Flashes:

MAIB: Sinking of tug Biter with loss of two lives

MAIB has published Accident Investigation 17/2024 relating to the girting and capsize of tug Biter with the loss of two lives.

Read more
Dropped object – strop parted over sharp edge

A cylinder was lifted to a height of approximately 6 metres over deck of the vessel, the sharp steel edges of the cylinder cut through the firehose protection and caused the strop to part.

Read more
Person injured when pry bar slipped

A crew member who was applying downward pressure to their pry bar to lift a track, fell towards the deck when the pry bar slipped.

Read more
MSF: High potential near miss during FRC maintenance

The Marine Safety Forum has published Safety Alert 26-01 relating to an incident where there was an unplanned lowering of an FRC to the sea

Read more
BSEE: Crane incident leads to serious facial injuries

BSEE has published Safety Alert 512 relating to a crane incident during well abandonment which led to a worker being struck and suffering serious facial injuries.

Read more

IMCA Safety Flashes summarise key safety matters and incidents, allowing lessons to be more easily learnt for the benefit of the entire offshore industry.

The effectiveness of the IMCA Safety Flash system depends on the industry sharing information and so avoiding repeat incidents. Incidents are classified according to IOGP's Life Saving Rules.

All information is anonymised or sanitised, as appropriate, and warnings for graphic content included where possible.

IMCA makes every effort to ensure both the accuracy and reliability of the information shared, but is not be liable for any guidance and/or recommendation and/or statement herein contained.

The information contained in this document does not fulfil or replace any individual's or Member's legal, regulatory or other duties or obligations in respect of their operations. Individuals and Members remain solely responsible for the safe, lawful and proper conduct of their operations.

Share your safety incidents with IMCA online. Sign-up to receive Safety Flashes straight to your email.