Electrical isolation: Failing to “prove dead” at the point of work

  • Safety Flash
  • Published on 16 May 2025
  • Generated on 25 February 2026
  • IMCA SF 09/25
  • 2 minute read

One of our members discovered that some personnel and worksites were not following the intent of their own company electrical isolation protocols.

What happened?

The principle of “proving dead” when working on electrical equipment, was not being followed at the point of work, at some worksites.

It was discovered some worksites are not proving dead at the point of work, only at the point of isolation, which can often be remote from the intended point of work. This increases the risk of serious injury or fatality due to potential errors occurring between the point of isolation and the intended workplace, and result in personnel inadvertently approaching an active system.

Example 1:

Isolating a vessel thruster (#6) at the main High Voltage (HV) switchboard. Proving dead at the switchboard and earthing at the switchboard, an engineer then goes to the point of work but does not “prove dead” the equipment to be worked upon. The engineer intended to go to thruster 6, but in fact went to thruster 7. Result: direct access and contact with live terminals.

Example 2:

An ROV technician isolated the port Remotely Operated Vehicle (ROV) at the Power Distribution Unit (PDU) and applied an earthing spider at the HV termination box. ROV technician then started work on the starboard ROV. Result: direct access and contact with live terminals.

Lesson learned

·       Crew members may inadvertently expose themselves to risk by failing to follow “proving dead” protocols at the point of work. Both of these events could easily have lead to serious injury or death.

·       Take the time to prove equipment dead at the worksite, at the actual point of work.

Members may wish to refer to

Latest Safety Flashes:

Fall from height during mooring due to rope tension reaction

Rope became entangled with the propellor during mooring operations of a tanker causing the operator to lose balance and fall onto the lower platform.

Read more
Missing protection – progressive wear on hydraulic hoses causes damage

During an inspection, several hydraulic hoses and fuel hoses were found in direct contact with surrounding surfaces and sharp edges.

Read more
Small engine room fire – flammable object ignited

While ramping up the starboard main engine, a small flammable foreign object ignited.

Read more
Positive: damage to Fast Rescue Craft davit wire rope caught before failure

During routine checks, it was observed that the FRC davit wire rope had a visible fracture at the socket termination area.

Read more
BSEE: Miscommunication and trapped pressure causes injury during valve maintenance

BSEE has published Safety Alert 509 relating to a gas release incident on an offshore platform.

Read more

IMCA Safety Flashes summarise key safety matters and incidents, allowing lessons to be more easily learnt for the benefit of the entire offshore industry.

The effectiveness of the IMCA Safety Flash system depends on the industry sharing information and so avoiding repeat incidents. Incidents are classified according to IOGP's Life Saving Rules.

All information is anonymised or sanitised, as appropriate, and warnings for graphic content included where possible.

IMCA makes every effort to ensure both the accuracy and reliability of the information shared, but is not be liable for any guidance and/or recommendation and/or statement herein contained.

The information contained in this document does not fulfil or replace any individual's or Member's legal, regulatory or other duties or obligations in respect of their operations. Individuals and Members remain solely responsible for the safe, lawful and proper conduct of their operations.

Share your safety incidents with IMCA online. Sign-up to receive Safety Flashes straight to your email.