Hydraulic hose failure caused collapse of heavy haulage trailer

  • Safety Flash
  • Published on 8 July 2014
  • Generated on 2 December 2024
  • IMCA SF 11/14
  • 3 minute read

A member has reported an incident in which a low loader collapsed at the quayside while carrying a 157t suction pile. 

What happened?

Suction piles (16m x 6m, 157t) were being transported to the quayside upending and storage area. The piles had previously been received at the site and moved from the quayside to their respective storage locations without incident using the heavy haulage trailer. Around 20 suction piles had been delivered to the support base and positioned in the storage areas. In readiness for mobilisation and offshore installation the suction piles were to be moved to an area close to the quayside before being up ended (positioned vertically).

Whilst the trailer was moving at a slow walking speed along the quayside, one of its hydraulic hoses burst. The hose was located near the rear of the trailer. This caused a loss of hydraulic pressure which caused the trailer to sink on the nearside which in turn made the load lower toward the quay. The wheels on the trailer’s offside lifted clear of the ground approximately 20cm and on the nearside of the trailer the suction pile saddles made contact with the concrete.

Following the incident the crawler cranes that were to offload at the upending area were tracked to the location and used to stabilise the load prior to levelling out the trailer (suspension on offside lowered). The trailer was then moved clear and the load transported to the upending area on the cranes.

Suction pile after hose failure

Suction pile after hose failure

Damaged hose

Damaged hose

Swipe to see next image

The following lessons were learnt:

  • The hydraulic hose that failed was located behind the wheel arch running along the chassis of the trailer; it was quite inaccessible for regular cleaning, inspection and maintenance.
  • The location of the hose was considered a ‘dirt trap’ which is considered likely to have led to its deterioration and subsequent failure.
  • The critical nature of this hose was not understood, and it was not recognised that failure could cause the trailer to list.
  • As a consequence of the above, no hose inspection or change out frequency had been specified.
  • The potential for failure of the suspension to cause the load to list was not considered at the risk assessment.

The incident highlights the need for suppliers and operators of specialist equipment to determine fully the potential critical failures of equipment and take preventative measures accordingly. Such failures should also be considered as part of risk assessments and, where appropriate, additional controls and required recovery measures agreed prior to the operation.

Members may wish to consider the following points when planning similar operations:

  • Check planned inspection and maintenance systems of equipment – are critical items considered.
  • Risk assessments – are potential failures and effects considered and assessed.
  • Consider pre-use checks of similar trailers – can a test to working pressure be conducted prior to loading.

After much searching using various key words, it can be established that whilst there are a number of incidents involving hydraulic hose failure, and any number of incidents in which the amongst the causes identified were failure to identify risks, this incident combining the two is without precedent in the IMCA Safety Flash system.

Latest Safety Flashes:

LTI: Finger injury during emergency recovery of ROV

A worker suffered a serious finger injury when their finger was caught between a crane wire and the recovery hook on an ROV.

Read more
BSEE: recurring hand injuries from alternative cutting devices

The United States Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE) has published Safety Alert 487.

Read more
NTSB: Crane wire failure

The National Transportation Safety Board of the United States (NTSB) published "Safer Seas Digest 2023".

Read more
Hot work performed outside of Permit to Work (PTW) boundary limit

A near miss occurred when a third-party contractor working removed a trip hazard from the vessel main deck, using a cutting torch and grinding disc.

Read more
Vital safety information (height of vehicle) found incorrect

“Height of vehicle” information displayed on a truck, was found to be incorrect.

Read more

IMCA Safety Flashes summarise key safety matters and incidents, allowing lessons to be more easily learnt for the benefit of the entire offshore industry.

The effectiveness of the IMCA Safety Flash system depends on the industry sharing information and so avoiding repeat incidents. Incidents are classified according to IOGP's Life Saving Rules.

All information is anonymised or sanitised, as appropriate, and warnings for graphic content included where possible.

IMCA makes every effort to ensure both the accuracy and reliability of the information shared, but is not be liable for any guidance and/or recommendation and/or statement herein contained.

The information contained in this document does not fulfil or replace any individual's or Member's legal, regulatory or other duties or obligations in respect of their operations. Individuals and Members remain solely responsible for the safe, lawful and proper conduct of their operations.

Share your safety incidents with IMCA online. Sign-up to receive Safety Flashes straight to your email.