MAIB: Engine failure and subsequent fire

  • Safety Flash
  • Published on 19 April 2021
  • Generated on 14 December 2024
  • IMCA SF 11/21
  • 2 minute read

The UK Marine Accident Investigation Branch (MAIB) has published it’s Report 2/2021 into an engine failure and subsequent fire on the ro-ro cargo vessel Finlandia Seaways in April 2018

What happened?

On 16 April 2018, the Lithuanian registered ro-ro cargo vessel Finlandia Seaways suffered a catastrophic main engine failure that caused serious structural damage to the engine and a fire in the engine room.

The vessel’s third engineer, who was on duty in the engine room at the time, suffered serious smoke-related lung, kidney and eye injuries during his escape.

What went wrong?

A main engine connecting rod broke.

Parts of the engine were thrown through the side of the crank case into the engine room, and a short but intense fire occurred. 

Within 20 minutes the crew had conducted a muster, sealed the engine room, activated its carbon dioxide fixed fire-fighting system and extinguished the fire.

The third engineer was medevaced to hospital and made a successful recovery.

Engine failure and subsequent fire

What were the causes?

The MAIB investigation identified that the catastrophic engine failure had been initiated by the failure of a single component (IMCA emphasis) and found that the standard and management of maintenance carried out by the vessel operator’s maintenance support contractor was a significant causal factor.

Other factors contributing to the engine failure included:

  • Standards of maintenance management.

  • Lack of appreciation of the importance of following the engine manufacturer’s instructions for the removal and refitting of the piston pin bearing bushes.

  • External oversight of the engine maintenance process.

The MAIB report further notes that:

  • Although the CO2 fire-fighting system was activated successfully, the third engineer was fortunate to have survived given that there were no emergency escape breathing devices on his escape route.

  • In common with other accidents in which carbon dioxide has been released following a fire, the inability to confirm which gas bottles had discharged hampered re-entry to the engine room

  • The voyage data recorder did not record the incident due to the uninterruptible power supply failing.

The full report can be downloaded here.  

Members may wish to review the following incidents, all three with causal factors being single point failures:

  • Lost time injury (LTI) and restricted workday case (RWC) following failure of diving bell door system

  • Power management system dynamic positioning (DP) incident

  • Grounding of ro-ro freight vessel Seatruck Performance  

Latest Safety Flashes:

LTI: Finger injury during emergency recovery of ROV

A worker suffered a serious finger injury when their finger was caught between a crane wire and the recovery hook on an ROV.

Read more
BSEE: recurring hand injuries from alternative cutting devices

The United States Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE) has published Safety Alert 487.

Read more
NTSB: Crane wire failure

The National Transportation Safety Board of the United States (NTSB) published "Safer Seas Digest 2023".

Read more
Hot work performed outside of Permit to Work (PTW) boundary limit

A near miss occurred when a third-party contractor working removed a trip hazard from the vessel main deck, using a cutting torch and grinding disc.

Read more
Vital safety information (height of vehicle) found incorrect

“Height of vehicle” information displayed on a truck, was found to be incorrect.

Read more

IMCA Safety Flashes summarise key safety matters and incidents, allowing lessons to be more easily learnt for the benefit of the entire offshore industry.

The effectiveness of the IMCA Safety Flash system depends on the industry sharing information and so avoiding repeat incidents. Incidents are classified according to IOGP's Life Saving Rules.

All information is anonymised or sanitised, as appropriate, and warnings for graphic content included where possible.

IMCA makes every effort to ensure both the accuracy and reliability of the information shared, but is not be liable for any guidance and/or recommendation and/or statement herein contained.

The information contained in this document does not fulfil or replace any individual's or Member's legal, regulatory or other duties or obligations in respect of their operations. Individuals and Members remain solely responsible for the safe, lawful and proper conduct of their operations.

Share your safety incidents with IMCA online. Sign-up to receive Safety Flashes straight to your email.