Failure of high pressure fitting

  • Safety Flash
  • Published on 30 December 2005
  • Generated on 11 December 2024
  • IMCA SF 12/05
  • 4 minute read

A Member has reported an incident wherein a half inch HP fitting failed at 200 bar.

What happened?

Whilst no damage was sustained other than to the fitting and the whip check and no injury was sustained, the incident is believed to have had the potential for more serious consequences and was investigated as a high potential event.

A dive vessel had been heading for port after completing a phase of work. Both diving bells had been surfaced to allow access for maintenance work. The gas from the bells had been reclaimed into storage in the gas hold of the vessel. The dirty reclaim tubes were full after this exercise, so it was decided to clean this gas for use later as a dive mix.

The on-shift life support supervisor (LSS) entered the gas hold to set up the gas supplies for cleaning, which included putting the dirty gas tubes on-line to the cleaner at a supply pressure of 200 bar gauge. Having opened the supply to the cleaner, he was walking towards it when he heard a loud bang and a continuous rush of gas. On turning round, he could see that the supply hose from the dirty gas had blown off and gas was venting into the gas hold from the tubes. He closed off the dirty reclaim tubes and isolated the escaping gas.

What were the causes?

On examination, it was noted that the Comex spin fitting that connected the gas whip to the supply manifold had blown off. The whip was undamaged. There was clear evidence of the track the female connection had made across the male connection as it parted. On examination of the fitting to ascertain the cause of the failure, it was noted that the gas whip fitting had blown off the supply connection.

Since there was no clear way of establishing if the other spin-fit fittings could be subjected to the same failure and since new fittings of the same type were not immediately available, the only safe course of action was to temporarily replace all the Comex spin-fit connections on the gas supply lines with JIC fittings. During the shift handover meetings immediately after the incident, all personnel were reminded to check that HP fittings and whip check cords were in good condition and correctly aligned.

It was concluded that the failure was likely caused by worn threads and daily use exerted on a 20-year old fitting that had been subjected to stretch as a normal part of daily use. It is believed the whip check cord failed due to the kinetic energy generated as the fitting blew, coupled with the fact that the whip check was not fully extended against the whip and had some slack in it. Corrosion may also have been a contributory cause of the failure.

The root causes were identified as being that:

  • There had been no planned maintenance/inspection ‘routine’ for checking wear on the Comex spin-fit fittings.

  • There had been uncertainty regarding how best to position whip check cords on the gas manifolds and how they should be rated to ensure they could cope with the energy that may be exerted upon them.

Actions

The following conclusions were drawn by the company involved:

  • Wear on the male/female thread of the Comex spin-fitting had been allowed to occur over a protracted period unchecked by any formal planned maintenance or inspection ‘routine’s.

  • Suitable replacement spin-fit fittings have been sourced and fitted on the gas manifolds in the gas hold and in saturation control. Planned maintenance instructions covering the inspection of the HP whips were revised to include inspection and testing of spin-fit connectors.

  • It proposes that high pressure fittings which are subject to wear be changed out every five years.

  • Increased awareness is required on how to fit whip checks correctly and more information is required on what size whip check to use on what application, i.e. diameter of hose and pressure within the hose both affect the amount of stored energy that could be released.

Latest Safety Flashes:

LTI: Finger injury during emergency recovery of ROV

A worker suffered a serious finger injury when their finger was caught between a crane wire and the recovery hook on an ROV.

Read more
BSEE: recurring hand injuries from alternative cutting devices

The United States Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE) has published Safety Alert 487.

Read more
NTSB: Crane wire failure

The National Transportation Safety Board of the United States (NTSB) published "Safer Seas Digest 2023".

Read more
Hot work performed outside of Permit to Work (PTW) boundary limit

A near miss occurred when a third-party contractor working removed a trip hazard from the vessel main deck, using a cutting torch and grinding disc.

Read more
Vital safety information (height of vehicle) found incorrect

“Height of vehicle” information displayed on a truck, was found to be incorrect.

Read more

IMCA Safety Flashes summarise key safety matters and incidents, allowing lessons to be more easily learnt for the benefit of the entire offshore industry.

The effectiveness of the IMCA Safety Flash system depends on the industry sharing information and so avoiding repeat incidents. Incidents are classified according to IOGP's Life Saving Rules.

All information is anonymised or sanitised, as appropriate, and warnings for graphic content included where possible.

IMCA makes every effort to ensure both the accuracy and reliability of the information shared, but is not be liable for any guidance and/or recommendation and/or statement herein contained.

The information contained in this document does not fulfil or replace any individual's or Member's legal, regulatory or other duties or obligations in respect of their operations. Individuals and Members remain solely responsible for the safe, lawful and proper conduct of their operations.

Share your safety incidents with IMCA online. Sign-up to receive Safety Flashes straight to your email.