Thermal tunnel buoyancy when deployed subsea
- Safety Flash
- Published on 28 August 2015
- Generated on 19 January 2026
- IMCA SF 12/15
- 2 minute read
A member has reported an incident in which buoyancy problems were encountered with equipment being deployed subsea.
What happened?
During light subsea construction operations conducted from a DSV, there was a requirement to deploy two ‘thermal tunnels’ as a barrier between an existing pipeline and a new umbilical being laid. When the thermal tunnel was deployed it became obvious to the crew that despite it weighing 515kg in air it would not penetrate the splash zone. The thermal tunnel was too buoyant and would not sink.
After investigation it was discovered that the manufacturer’s buoyancy calculations were incorrect; these were checked by the on-board engineering team. These thermal tunnels are manufactured for subsea use without appropriate quality checks being carried out by the manufacturer.
Our member learnt that this could have been prevented had there been a sea water wet trial performed by the manufacturer before delivery to the client, or if there had been independent verification of the mass, volume, and displacement, and of the buoyancy calculations. This finding was passed back to the manufacturer. Our member noted that for all items deployed subsea the upward force or buoyancy should be independently verified by an engineer.
Thermal tunnel with additional weights
Section through thermal tunnel on seabed
The following actions were taken:
- Consulted with manufacturer to ensure that these findings were passed back appropriately
- Generated a management of change process and applied a temporary solution, whereby additional weight was added to the thermal tunnel to assist with the installation. The thermal tunnel was successfully installed in position and covered with a concrete mattress
- Ensured that all future deployments of thermal tunnels would have manufacturers’ certification of wet test, or independent validation of mass detailing suitability for subsea use.
It was noted that a remaining risk was that if the concrete mattress was subsequently removed and the weight fixings in the meantime had perished, the buoyancy issue would be realised again. This is an unknown but should be taken into consideration in future. members using thermal tunnels may wish to review their procedures to mitigate the risk of tunnels floating to the surface, as this is a potential hazard to both divers and vessels.
IMCA Safety Flashes summarise key safety matters and incidents, allowing lessons to be more easily learnt for the benefit of the entire offshore industry.
The effectiveness of the IMCA Safety Flash system depends on the industry sharing information and so avoiding repeat incidents. Incidents are classified according to IOGP's Life Saving Rules.
All information is anonymised or sanitised, as appropriate, and warnings for graphic content included where possible.
IMCA makes every effort to ensure both the accuracy and reliability of the information shared, but is not be liable for any guidance and/or recommendation and/or statement herein contained.
The information contained in this document does not fulfil or replace any individual's or Member's legal, regulatory or other duties or obligations in respect of their operations. Individuals and Members remain solely responsible for the safe, lawful and proper conduct of their operations.
Share your safety incidents with IMCA online. Sign-up to receive Safety Flashes straight to your email.