LTI: Finger injury sustained handling heavy shackle pin

  • Safety Flash
  • Published on 2 June 2017
  • Generated on 13 December 2024
  • IMCA SF 13/17
  • 2 minute read

During re-rigging of heavy lifting gear, two riggers were holding the crane hook upright, another three were holding the shackle, and a sixth crewman was holding the shackle pin ready for insertion. 

What happened?

As the sixth crew member pushed the shackle pin home, his left index finger was nipped between the head of the shackle and the body of the shackle.

This resulted in a serious injury to the index finger of the left hand.

The crew member's left index finger was nipped between the head of the shackle and the body of the shackle. This resulted in a serious injury to the index finger of the left hand.

What were the causes of the incident?

Our member identified the following immediate causes:

  • Not paying attention – lack of awareness of hazards; this was due to the routine nature of the activity.

  • Inadequate personal protective equipment (PPE) – impact-resistant gloves not worn; these could have reduced the severity of the incident.

The following underlying causes were identified:

  • Complacency – due to the repetitive nature of this routine activity.
  • Prescribed PPE was not worn due in part to poor communication and poor enforcement of the requirements.
  • Poor design of the shackle pin and the method used for rigging may have contributed to the incident – the size and shape of the pin head left little room for the fingers to hold.
  • Environment – the work area was restricted and cramped.

What lessons were learned? And what were the actions?

  • Easier rigging arrangements involving less manual handling would be investigated, including the possible use of mechanical aids.

Members may wish to review:

  • Finger injury during maintenance work – restricted work case

Latest Safety Flashes:

LTI: Finger injury during emergency recovery of ROV

A worker suffered a serious finger injury when their finger was caught between a crane wire and the recovery hook on an ROV.

Read more
BSEE: recurring hand injuries from alternative cutting devices

The United States Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE) has published Safety Alert 487.

Read more
NTSB: Crane wire failure

The National Transportation Safety Board of the United States (NTSB) published "Safer Seas Digest 2023".

Read more
Hot work performed outside of Permit to Work (PTW) boundary limit

A near miss occurred when a third-party contractor working removed a trip hazard from the vessel main deck, using a cutting torch and grinding disc.

Read more
Vital safety information (height of vehicle) found incorrect

“Height of vehicle” information displayed on a truck, was found to be incorrect.

Read more

IMCA Safety Flashes summarise key safety matters and incidents, allowing lessons to be more easily learnt for the benefit of the entire offshore industry.

The effectiveness of the IMCA Safety Flash system depends on the industry sharing information and so avoiding repeat incidents. Incidents are classified according to IOGP's Life Saving Rules.

All information is anonymised or sanitised, as appropriate, and warnings for graphic content included where possible.

IMCA makes every effort to ensure both the accuracy and reliability of the information shared, but is not be liable for any guidance and/or recommendation and/or statement herein contained.

The information contained in this document does not fulfil or replace any individual's or Member's legal, regulatory or other duties or obligations in respect of their operations. Individuals and Members remain solely responsible for the safe, lawful and proper conduct of their operations.

Share your safety incidents with IMCA online. Sign-up to receive Safety Flashes straight to your email.