Pedestal Drill Chuck Assembly Detached Causing Head Injury

  • Safety Flash
  • Published on 22 May 2020
  • Generated on 2 December 2024
  • IMCA SF 16/20
  • 2 minute read

What happened?

A crewman was drilling a hole through a wooden plank using a benchtop heavy drill machine in the vessel’s engine room. The drill chuck assembly detached and hit the right side of his forehead resulting in a laceration above his right eyebrow.

A crewman was drilling a hole through a wooden plank using a benchtop heavy drill machine in the vessel’s engine  room. The drill chuck assembly detached and hit the right side of his forehead resulting in a laceration above his  right eyebrow.
A crewman was drilling a hole through a wooden plank using a benchtop heavy drill machine in the vessel’s engine  room. The drill chuck assembly detached and hit the right side of his forehead resulting in a laceration above his  right eyebrow.
A crewman was drilling a hole through a wooden plank using a benchtop heavy drill machine in the vessel’s engine  room. The drill chuck assembly detached and hit the right side of his forehead resulting in a laceration above his  right eyebrow.

What went wrong?

Our member’s investigation noted that:

  • The bench top drill was not fit to use, as the spindle sleeve was not available.
  • There had been an unauthorised modification of the drill chuck assembly (spindle sleeve) – a hexagon headed bolt was modified for use as a spindle sleeve.
  • The injured person and the supervisor were not fully aware of the scope of the assigned activities or job requirements.
  • The job should have been stopped but the risk was deemed tolerable. Safety controls were bypassed.
  • No personal protective equipment (PPE) was worn.
  • The injured person was not familiar with the bench top drill assembly, operation or safety precautions and it was his first time operating the machine.

What were the causes?

  • The immediate cause of the injury was the ejection of the chuck assembly along with the modified spindle sleeve from the spindle hole.
  • The root causes were lack of appropriate supervision and lack of a safe system of work – the injured person should never have been allowed near the machine.
  • Causal factors included:
    • risk was seen as tolerable by both the supervisor and the injured person.
    • the bench top drill had not been quarantined to prevent unauthorised use.
    • there had been no appropriate toolbox talk or risk assessment beforehand.

What lessons were learned? What actions were taken?

  • Handmade or modified tools should not be used.
  • Tools and equipment to be inspected for their fitness, and unfit equipment to be isolated – all equipment was subject to further inspection and unfit equipment was removed from the vessel.

Members may wish to refer to:

  • Failure of Home-Made Equipment
  • Welding of Shackles
  • Hand Injury Whilst Using Pillar Drill
  • Arm Injury Whilst Using Pillar Drill
  • Tolerable” – see https://www.imca-int.com/?s=tolerable

Latest Safety Flashes:

LTI: Finger injury during emergency recovery of ROV

A worker suffered a serious finger injury when their finger was caught between a crane wire and the recovery hook on an ROV.

Read more
BSEE: recurring hand injuries from alternative cutting devices

The United States Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE) has published Safety Alert 487.

Read more
NTSB: Crane wire failure

The National Transportation Safety Board of the United States (NTSB) published "Safer Seas Digest 2023".

Read more
Hot work performed outside of Permit to Work (PTW) boundary limit

A near miss occurred when a third-party contractor working removed a trip hazard from the vessel main deck, using a cutting torch and grinding disc.

Read more
Vital safety information (height of vehicle) found incorrect

“Height of vehicle” information displayed on a truck, was found to be incorrect.

Read more

IMCA Safety Flashes summarise key safety matters and incidents, allowing lessons to be more easily learnt for the benefit of the entire offshore industry.

The effectiveness of the IMCA Safety Flash system depends on the industry sharing information and so avoiding repeat incidents. Incidents are classified according to IOGP's Life Saving Rules.

All information is anonymised or sanitised, as appropriate, and warnings for graphic content included where possible.

IMCA makes every effort to ensure both the accuracy and reliability of the information shared, but is not be liable for any guidance and/or recommendation and/or statement herein contained.

The information contained in this document does not fulfil or replace any individual's or Member's legal, regulatory or other duties or obligations in respect of their operations. Individuals and Members remain solely responsible for the safe, lawful and proper conduct of their operations.

Share your safety incidents with IMCA online. Sign-up to receive Safety Flashes straight to your email.