Dropped object during lifting operations

  • Safety Flash
  • Published on 16 June 2021
  • Generated on 13 December 2024
  • IMCA SF 17/21
  • 3 minute read

A part weighing 8.5 kg fell over 15 m from a pipelay tower to deck.

What happened?

The incident occurred when tensioner pads were being changed out on a Tiltable Lay System (TLS). The discarded pads were packed into two dedicated tensioner pad baskets on the TLS tower for transfer back to deck. The crane operator lifted a first basket and placed it in the landing zone on deck. When lifting the second basket, a higher boom angle was needed in order to clear the TLS. As the basket cleared the TLS, it started swaying. This movement was amplified after the basket hit the crane boom, causing a single tensioner pad to fall from the basket down to the main deck.

The displaced tensioner pad fell approximately 15 to 18 metres. There was no-one in the area at the time, and the area of the crane lift path had been barriered off as an exclusion zone. 

Dropped object during lifting operations
Dropped object during lifting operations

What went wrong?

Our members’ findings were:

  • The dropped object (tensioner pad) resulted from the excessive movement of an unsecured load.

  • The change-out of tensioner pads was considered a “routine lift” and did not require a designated Lift Plan (with a specific slew path identified).

  • The operation took place at night and the sea conditions were not apparent to the crane operator or banksman when they started the lift.

  • Risk assessments

    • Although a risk assessment for routine lifts had been reviewed at the Toolbox Talk (TBT), the risk assessment specific to tensioner pad change-out (which includes the lifting of the baskets) was not reviewed before starting the task.

    • The risk assessment specific to the tensioner pad change-out was inadequate – it did not specify a cover for the tensioner basket, nor did it take into account the effect of the sea state/swell on the swing of the load and how this should be factored into the chosen slew path.

  • The locking mechanism on the side door of the tensioner pad basket was found to be inadequate and could have quite easily sprung open.

Lessons learned

  • An alternate slew path with a high boom angle would have avoided the basket striking the crane and cause increased swing.

  • A cover or net fitted to the basket would have prevented the pad being displaced.

Actions

  • Check all lifting appliances, supports and baskets to ensure they are fit for purpose including that doors have secure locking mechanisms.

  • Never overfill and always secure the load in open top containers.

  • Crane operators and banksman should work together to identify the best possible routes for moving equipment around the vessel taking sea state/swell into consideration.

  • The vessel bridge should always be consulted before starting lifting operations, to ensure the sea state and vessel movements are within limits and where practical a heading to reduce vessel movement is taken.

Latest Safety Flashes:

LTI: Finger injury during emergency recovery of ROV

A worker suffered a serious finger injury when their finger was caught between a crane wire and the recovery hook on an ROV.

Read more
BSEE: recurring hand injuries from alternative cutting devices

The United States Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE) has published Safety Alert 487.

Read more
NTSB: Crane wire failure

The National Transportation Safety Board of the United States (NTSB) published "Safer Seas Digest 2023".

Read more
Hot work performed outside of Permit to Work (PTW) boundary limit

A near miss occurred when a third-party contractor working removed a trip hazard from the vessel main deck, using a cutting torch and grinding disc.

Read more
Vital safety information (height of vehicle) found incorrect

“Height of vehicle” information displayed on a truck, was found to be incorrect.

Read more

IMCA Safety Flashes summarise key safety matters and incidents, allowing lessons to be more easily learnt for the benefit of the entire offshore industry.

The effectiveness of the IMCA Safety Flash system depends on the industry sharing information and so avoiding repeat incidents. Incidents are classified according to IOGP's Life Saving Rules.

All information is anonymised or sanitised, as appropriate, and warnings for graphic content included where possible.

IMCA makes every effort to ensure both the accuracy and reliability of the information shared, but is not be liable for any guidance and/or recommendation and/or statement herein contained.

The information contained in this document does not fulfil or replace any individual's or Member's legal, regulatory or other duties or obligations in respect of their operations. Individuals and Members remain solely responsible for the safe, lawful and proper conduct of their operations.

Share your safety incidents with IMCA online. Sign-up to receive Safety Flashes straight to your email.