MOB fatality from multi-cat

  • Safety Flash
  • Published on 13 July 2020
  • Generated on 14 December 2024
  • IMCA SF 21/20
  • 2 minute read

What happened?

A member reports a man overboard fatality which occurred from a multi-cat engaged in shallow water construction in an inshore environment. The task involved recovery and re-arrangement of a pipeline configuration, consisting of 3 x 300m sinker-pipe, which was connected to shore using 7 floating  pontoons. Three separate pipes were used for dewatering a reclamation site.  One of the pipes including pontoons was partly submerged.  The operation took place in low light conditions during the hours of darkness

The initial plan was to re-float the pipeline with a technique using compressed air.  Whilst the task was ongoing, there was a change to the plan, and it was decided to lift the floating pipeline configuration using the crane on the multi-cat.  As the lift started, one of the floating pontoons flipped over the pipeline and hit the Chief Engineer who was operating the crane, causing him to fall overboard.  Immediately an AB on deck jumped overboard to help him; the Chief Engineer was recovered and first aid /CPR undertaken.  He was transferred to hospital but was unfortunately declared dead later that evening.

A member reports a man overboard fatality which occurred from a multi-cat engaged in shallow water construction in an inshore environment

What went wrong?

During the operations, the decision was made on-site to change the plan and use the deck crane of the multi-cat to lift the pipe-line and use another workboat to place a pontoon underneath. One of the pontoons was not secured to the pipeline; this came loose, surfaced and flipped over the floating pipeline, hitting the multi-cat crane and the Chief Engineer, who was driving the crane.

  • There was an unplanned change, from using the air compressor to lifting the pipeline using the multi-cat crane.
  • There was no risk assessment nor Management of Change (MoC) process applied to the changed plan.

What were the causes?

Our Member’s investigation identified the following root causes:

  • Inadequate worksite supervision
    • Site supervisor ignored the instructions to postpone the operations after the first attempt to follow the initial plan. He changed the plan, without following the appropriate MoC process.
    • Operations were conducted in hours of darkness, against company instructions.
  • Unsafe Lifting Operations
    • The sunken dewatering-line was lifted using the Multi-Cat deck crane.
  • Lack of Situational Awareness
    • There was no adequate (risk) assessment of the job or work area.
    • No-one involved recognised the hazardous situations and did not use STOP WORK authority.

Actions

Members may wish to refer to

  • HSS035 In the line of fire video

Latest Safety Flashes:

LTI: Finger injury during emergency recovery of ROV

A worker suffered a serious finger injury when their finger was caught between a crane wire and the recovery hook on an ROV.

Read more
BSEE: recurring hand injuries from alternative cutting devices

The United States Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE) has published Safety Alert 487.

Read more
NTSB: Crane wire failure

The National Transportation Safety Board of the United States (NTSB) published "Safer Seas Digest 2023".

Read more
Hot work performed outside of Permit to Work (PTW) boundary limit

A near miss occurred when a third-party contractor working removed a trip hazard from the vessel main deck, using a cutting torch and grinding disc.

Read more
Vital safety information (height of vehicle) found incorrect

“Height of vehicle” information displayed on a truck, was found to be incorrect.

Read more

IMCA Safety Flashes summarise key safety matters and incidents, allowing lessons to be more easily learnt for the benefit of the entire offshore industry.

The effectiveness of the IMCA Safety Flash system depends on the industry sharing information and so avoiding repeat incidents. Incidents are classified according to IOGP's Life Saving Rules.

All information is anonymised or sanitised, as appropriate, and warnings for graphic content included where possible.

IMCA makes every effort to ensure both the accuracy and reliability of the information shared, but is not be liable for any guidance and/or recommendation and/or statement herein contained.

The information contained in this document does not fulfil or replace any individual's or Member's legal, regulatory or other duties or obligations in respect of their operations. Individuals and Members remain solely responsible for the safe, lawful and proper conduct of their operations.

Share your safety incidents with IMCA online. Sign-up to receive Safety Flashes straight to your email.