Fatality due to fire incident and fall from height

  • Safety Flash
  • Published on 12 September 2023
  • Generated on 14 December 2024
  • IMCA SF 22/23
  • 3 minute read

A rope access technician had a fatal fall from around 8.5 m while engaged in routine maintenance activities on a pipelay tower

What happened?

A rope access technician had a fatal fall from around 8.5m while engaged in routine maintenance activities on a pipelay tower.

Work was conducted by different vessel work groups, with each team independently completing their permits to work, following the vessel’s safety management system’s requirements. 

The rope access technician was doing work consisting of chipping, brushing and painting. To clean the area before painting, the worker decided to bring a bucket of thinners (solvent).

At the same time, another group of workers were engaged in tack welding activities at the top of the tower.

Some of the welding particles fell from the welding location and ignited the bucket of thinners.

The heat produced by the fire melted the rope access technician’s body harness resulting in a fatal fall from the height of approx. 8.5m.

A rope access technician had a fatal fall from around 8.5m while engaged in routine maintenance activities on a pipelay tower. Work was conducted by  different vessel work groups, with each team independently completing their  permits to work, following the vessel’s safety  management system’s requirements

Overview of the incident

  • The potential conflict between the two activities was not properly evaluated.
  • Sparks were coming down from the welding location above because of incomplete protection of the area with fire blankets.
  • Thinners (solvent) were taken from the paint store without authorization and its use was not foreseen for the specific activity.

The Bahamas Maritime Authority has published Safety Alert 23-01 into this incident and highlights the following:

  • Lack of full team representation and involvement in pre-planning meetings.
  • Safety management system requirements were implemented, but in isolation: rendering them ineffective by other simultaneous operations.
  • Inadequate high-level supervision and control for multiple activities.
  • The vessel’s “stop work” policy was ineffective.

Lessons learned

  • Permits to Work should correctly identify all salient aspects of the job before starting any activity, including:
    • all hazards and precautions to be taken by the working team
    • the precise location of the work
    • the exact activities for which it has been issued
    • any potential SIMOPS
  • All stakeholders should be involved with pre-planning meetings and tool-box meetings;
  • If an activity needs to be stopped, the Permit to work should be withdrawn.
  • While conducting simultaneous operations, effective supervision means maintaining oversight of the entire operation to enable identification of areas which overlap and the associated potential risks.
  • Address vessel and crew safety holistically, not as isolated departments, to ensure all teams have a unified understanding of ongoing operations and how it relates to their work. This contributes to an overarching understanding of risk, rather than just a team-specific focus.
  • Ensure fuller understanding and use of Stop work authority.

Latest Safety Flashes:

LTI: Finger injury during emergency recovery of ROV

A worker suffered a serious finger injury when their finger was caught between a crane wire and the recovery hook on an ROV.

Read more
BSEE: recurring hand injuries from alternative cutting devices

The United States Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE) has published Safety Alert 487.

Read more
NTSB: Crane wire failure

The National Transportation Safety Board of the United States (NTSB) published "Safer Seas Digest 2023".

Read more
Hot work performed outside of Permit to Work (PTW) boundary limit

A near miss occurred when a third-party contractor working removed a trip hazard from the vessel main deck, using a cutting torch and grinding disc.

Read more
Vital safety information (height of vehicle) found incorrect

“Height of vehicle” information displayed on a truck, was found to be incorrect.

Read more

IMCA Safety Flashes summarise key safety matters and incidents, allowing lessons to be more easily learnt for the benefit of the entire offshore industry.

The effectiveness of the IMCA Safety Flash system depends on the industry sharing information and so avoiding repeat incidents. Incidents are classified according to IOGP's Life Saving Rules.

All information is anonymised or sanitised, as appropriate, and warnings for graphic content included where possible.

IMCA makes every effort to ensure both the accuracy and reliability of the information shared, but is not be liable for any guidance and/or recommendation and/or statement herein contained.

The information contained in this document does not fulfil or replace any individual's or Member's legal, regulatory or other duties or obligations in respect of their operations. Individuals and Members remain solely responsible for the safe, lawful and proper conduct of their operations.

Share your safety incidents with IMCA online. Sign-up to receive Safety Flashes straight to your email.