Electric Arc Incident

  • Safety Flash
  • Published on 2 October 2018
  • Generated on 2 April 2026
  • IMCA SF 23/18
  • 3 minute read

During a vessel mobilisation a control cabin for an electric ROV was being installed and commissioned.

What happened?

The cabin’s internal main electrical power cable arced, tripping the vessel’s power circuit breaker. The arcing, witnessed by an ROV technician, came from a coil of electrical cabling which had been left hanging from trunking in close proximity to the cabin’s internal transformer. This cable was the main electrical power feed from the external power source socket to the internal transformer and had been supplied disconnected and with exposed conductors. The cable’s conductors had arced when the cabins electrical system was energised, producing a bright flash and audible bang.

Although there was no actual injury or equipment damage, there was serious potential for both.

Exposed coil of electrical cabling
Technician distance from location

What went wrong? What were the causes?

  • There was no external power socket available at the workshop base for powering the control cabin during testing and preparation. The work team developed a workaround disconnecting the control cabin’s main electrical cable and hardwiring the power supply from the base directly into the control cabin’s transformer.
  • There was no management of change (MoC) process conducted as this operation was seen as a temporary change to the equipment. The change to the transformers electrical input was not formally documented or communicated to the personnel that would be working on the system.
  • A combination of inadequate supervision, instruction and experience resulted in the failure to recognise that the main power cable had not been correctly reinstated prior to shipping.
  • The pre-mobilisation checklist was also found to be insufficient in detail and did not include a check for testing or inspection of the main power cable.
  • Electrical testing of the control van was not considered necessary and was not included in the mobilisation procedure.
  • Despite several technicians working in close proximity to the exposed hanging cable, it was not identified as a hazard prior to connection to the ship’s power.

What lessons were learned?

  • Ensure power supply requirements are adequately identified before the job starts.
  • Worksites should ensure they have an appropriate selection of electrical sockets on site for correct equipment connections.
  • Ensure an MoC process is applied to control all temporary equipment modifications.
  • Reiterate to work team leaders the importance of effective job briefings, which confirm job expectations and responsibilities in sufficient detail of the work to be undertaken.
  • Review pre-mobilisation checklists to ensure they include the requirement for adequate checks for loose or hanging cables, exposed conductors and unsafe electrical conditions before the appropriate testing of the main electrical system is carried out.
  • Mobilisation procedures should include checks prior to electrical hook-up for the appropriate testing of electrical cables and inspection for unsafe conditions.
  • Roles and responsibilities should be clearly identified and documented on any worksite where electrical commissioning, testing or installation is being conducted.

Latest Safety Flashes:

MAIB: Sinking of tug Biter with loss of two lives

MAIB has published Accident Investigation 17/2024 relating to the girting and capsize of tug Biter with the loss of two lives.

Read more
Dropped object – strop parted over sharp edge

A cylinder was lifted to a height of approximately 6 metres over deck of the vessel, the sharp steel edges of the cylinder cut through the firehose protection and caused the strop to part.

Read more
Person injured when pry bar slipped

A crew member who was applying downward pressure to their pry bar to lift a track, fell towards the deck when the pry bar slipped.

Read more
MSF: High potential near miss during FRC maintenance

The Marine Safety Forum has published Safety Alert 26-01 relating to an incident where there was an unplanned lowering of an FRC to the sea

Read more
BSEE: Crane incident leads to serious facial injuries

BSEE has published Safety Alert 512 relating to a crane incident during well abandonment which led to a worker being struck and suffering serious facial injuries.

Read more

IMCA Safety Flashes summarise key safety matters and incidents, allowing lessons to be more easily learnt for the benefit of the entire offshore industry.

The effectiveness of the IMCA Safety Flash system depends on the industry sharing information and so avoiding repeat incidents. Incidents are classified according to IOGP's Life Saving Rules.

All information is anonymised or sanitised, as appropriate, and warnings for graphic content included where possible.

IMCA makes every effort to ensure both the accuracy and reliability of the information shared, but is not be liable for any guidance and/or recommendation and/or statement herein contained.

The information contained in this document does not fulfil or replace any individual's or Member's legal, regulatory or other duties or obligations in respect of their operations. Individuals and Members remain solely responsible for the safe, lawful and proper conduct of their operations.

Share your safety incidents with IMCA online. Sign-up to receive Safety Flashes straight to your email.