Case study: Saturation diver fatality due to hydrogen sulphide

  • Safety Flash
  • Published on 27 November 2023
  • Generated on 12 December 2024
  • IMCA SF 27/23
  • 3 minute read

This is a very brief summary of a 2021 case report on the much earlier death of a saturation diver in the Bombay High oilfield, which occurred as a result of Hydrogen Sulphide poisoning.

What happened?

The summary is included as a reminder of the danger of  Hydrogen Sulphide and as a means to facilitate discussion. The full case study, prepared by Dr Ajit C Kulkarni, of Hyperbaric Solutions, Mumbai, India, can be found here.

The incident happened on board a vessel operating in an offshore oil field, on a long charter for carrying out inspection, maintenance and repair duties.  An oil leak was discovered in one of the main 36-inch (91cm) diameter subsea lines carrying sour crude. The vessel was directed to proceed to the site and carry out pipeline repairs on an emergency basis at 74 msw depth.

A diver was deployed from the bell at 65m depth, a short distance away from the pipeline, not directly above it. On reaching the seabed, the diver approached the leaking pipeline to locate the rupture and conduct a close survey of the leak area and the pipeline. The seabed all around the trench was covered with oil sludge. After getting preliminary details, he returned to the bell. 

Shortly after he had returned to the bell, first the bellman, then the diver himself, collapsed. Not having secured the safety harness, the diver fell into the water and was carried away by the current, and drowned. A bell-to-bell rescue of the bellman was arranged with equipment and divers from another nearby vessel. Following medical treatment, he made a full recovery and was diving a month later. The lost diver’s body was recovered the following day.

What was the cause?

The presence of Hydrogen Sulphide (H2S) in the bell was the root cause.

The diver, while working near the pipeline, had dislodged oil sludge which resulted in release of dissolved H2S. Although the diving bell was not directly above the leak, there is a possibility that some H2S entered the diving bell. At that time, an electronic continuous gas monitoring system was not fitted in the diving bell nor was a handheld detection unit carried in the bell. The diving supervisor would not have had any indication of H2S in bell.

Another possibility is that there was a considerable amount of oil was on the diver’s suit. His umbilical was also covered with oil sludge. Rising from the seabed to the bell, the pressure decreased by almost 100 kPa (one bar), reducing the solubility of H2S in oil, and excess gas was released from solution and entered the bell,  causing the bellman and diver to collapse.

Hydrogen Sulphide

The permissible exposure limit of H2S is 15 parts per million (ppm) for 15 min at normal temperature and pressure.

At 10 ppm it has a ‘rotten egg’ smell but at concentrations above 200 ppm, the olfactory nerve becomes paralysed immediately.

At concentrations above 500 ppm often the sense of equilibrium is lost and the affected person can become unconscious.

Beyond 1000 ppm death is almost instantaneous.

Actions

The case study notes that, ideally, a remotely operated vehicle (ROV) could have carried out a pipeline survey at zero risk.

When this accident happened, ROVs were not routinely available.

Today, work ROVs are present on MSVs and carry out pipeline surveys, marine growth removal, etc.

Divers continue to work on pipelines but a similar accident has not recurred. 

Latest Safety Flashes:

LTI: Finger injury during emergency recovery of ROV

A worker suffered a serious finger injury when their finger was caught between a crane wire and the recovery hook on an ROV.

Read more
BSEE: recurring hand injuries from alternative cutting devices

The United States Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE) has published Safety Alert 487.

Read more
NTSB: Crane wire failure

The National Transportation Safety Board of the United States (NTSB) published "Safer Seas Digest 2023".

Read more
Hot work performed outside of Permit to Work (PTW) boundary limit

A near miss occurred when a third-party contractor working removed a trip hazard from the vessel main deck, using a cutting torch and grinding disc.

Read more
Vital safety information (height of vehicle) found incorrect

“Height of vehicle” information displayed on a truck, was found to be incorrect.

Read more

IMCA Safety Flashes summarise key safety matters and incidents, allowing lessons to be more easily learnt for the benefit of the entire offshore industry.

The effectiveness of the IMCA Safety Flash system depends on the industry sharing information and so avoiding repeat incidents. Incidents are classified according to IOGP's Life Saving Rules.

All information is anonymised or sanitised, as appropriate, and warnings for graphic content included where possible.

IMCA makes every effort to ensure both the accuracy and reliability of the information shared, but is not be liable for any guidance and/or recommendation and/or statement herein contained.

The information contained in this document does not fulfil or replace any individual's or Member's legal, regulatory or other duties or obligations in respect of their operations. Individuals and Members remain solely responsible for the safe, lawful and proper conduct of their operations.

Share your safety incidents with IMCA online. Sign-up to receive Safety Flashes straight to your email.