Unexpected movement of conductor during diver dredging operations
- Safety Flash
- Published on 28 October 2021
- Generated on 24 March 2025
- IMCA SF 29/21
- 2 minute read
Divers were conducting dredging operations in preparation for an external cut of a conductor (E5 in the diagram below) using a diamond wire saw.
What happened?
Due to seabed conditions, this was one of a number of dives dedicated to making conditions suitable for the conductor cutting. As the divers continued dredging, the conductor moved unexpectedly and came to rest against an adjacent conductor (E2 in the diagram below).
Diver 2’s umbilical was found to be in free span between the two conductors. As a precaution, the decision was made to secure the conductor to the vessel crane and manoeuvre the vessel to allow the umbilical to be released. This was conducted successfully, and the divers recovered to bell with no injury nor damage to umbilical.
What were the causes?
Our member noted the following:
- Immediate Cause – Conductor toppled at a severance point due to displacement of surrounding seabed and grout during dredging operations.
- Underlying Causes – assumption that the conductor was stable, due to:
- Information relating to the task (an incomplete sub-surface cut) had not been highlighted during client work pack compilation.
- Unclear datum measurement with respect to the as-found mudline and potential scouring.
- Information relating to the task (an incomplete sub-surface cut) had not been highlighted during client work pack compilation.
- Root Cause – the vessel team did not have all the relevant information they needed, to complete a suitable Management of Change to move from internal to external cutting of the conductor.
Actions
- Change to methodology for diver work around conductors, so that they are restrained with rigging prior to any dredging operations.
- Ensure suitable verification of data by client during onshore project preparation phase.
- Refine and update existing engineering best practice and risk assessment for cutting operations.
- Ensure management of change procedure provides suitable guidance on process for evaluating and approving change request in line with agreed risk level.
Related Safety Flashes
-
IMCA SF 30/19
17 December 2019
-
-
IMCA SF 20/19
23 August 2019
-
-
IMCA SF 19/18
3 September 2018
-
IMCA Safety Flashes summarise key safety matters and incidents, allowing lessons to be more easily learnt for the benefit of the entire offshore industry.
The effectiveness of the IMCA Safety Flash system depends on the industry sharing information and so avoiding repeat incidents. Incidents are classified according to IOGP's Life Saving Rules.
All information is anonymised or sanitised, as appropriate, and warnings for graphic content included where possible.
IMCA makes every effort to ensure both the accuracy and reliability of the information shared, but is not be liable for any guidance and/or recommendation and/or statement herein contained.
The information contained in this document does not fulfil or replace any individual's or Member's legal, regulatory or other duties or obligations in respect of their operations. Individuals and Members remain solely responsible for the safe, lawful and proper conduct of their operations.
Share your safety incidents with IMCA online. Sign-up to receive Safety Flashes straight to your email.