How PPE works – A reminder

  • Safety Flash
  • Published on 16 December 2020
  • Generated on 5 December 2024
  • IMCA SF 34/20
  • 3 minute read

The Marine Safety Forum (MSF) has published two recent incidents in which failure to wear PPE was a factor:

  • In the first incident (MSF 20-12), there was deliberate failure to wear PPE where it ought to have been worn.

  • In the second (MSF 20-09), a person suffered injury when their foot was caught in a heavy water-tight door on the bridge. The person was not wearing safety boots/shoes at the time.

Incident 1 (MSF 20-12)

A vessel was alongside a break water berth in port, when two shore operatives who were engaged in connecting a diesel fuel hose were observed by the Officer of the Watch to be working on the edge of the quayside within the 1.0m PPE zone without inflatable lifejackets.

What was the cause

The operatives were fully aware of the 1.0m PPE requirement but decided to cross the painted line on the quay as they had left their inflatable lifejackets back at their base.

Actions

The vessel crew intervened, the job was stopped and the correct PPE was provided to the shore operatives, who were reminded of the port authority requirements to wear lifejackets when working within the 1.0m line. Once correct PPE was in place the job resumed.

Incident 2 (MSF 20-09)

The injured party stepped outside during his watch to investigate an error.  On his return he entered the wheelhouse from the outer bridge deck through the weather tight door. At the time of entering the bridge, the vessel made a slight roll.

Due to the weight of the door (approx. 350 kg ), and holding the door while passing through, he lost control of the door, which trapped his foot as it slammed shut. He sustained some bruising, which was treated with a cold ice pack. 

What was the cause
  • While the weight of the door was widely acknowledged as a hazard, no risk assessment was in place.

  • The IP was not wearing safety boots or safety shoes at the time.
Actions
  • Wear safety boots or safety shoes when at work – even on the bridge.

  • Conduct risk assessment on hazards and implement all reasonably possible preventative measures, including correct PPE.

  • Improved design / automatic locking device for door, identified/ordered during subsequent risk assessment.
The injured person was not wearing safety boots or safety shoes at the time

Members may wish to refer to:

  • How PPE works: Fire and thermal protection  
  • Crewman suffers cut to hand – but gloves prevented it being much worse  
  • Personal injury following PPE violation and slip and fall on deck  

Latest Safety Flashes:

LTI: Finger injury during emergency recovery of ROV

A worker suffered a serious finger injury when their finger was caught between a crane wire and the recovery hook on an ROV.

Read more
BSEE: recurring hand injuries from alternative cutting devices

The United States Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE) has published Safety Alert 487.

Read more
NTSB: Crane wire failure

The National Transportation Safety Board of the United States (NTSB) published "Safer Seas Digest 2023".

Read more
Hot work performed outside of Permit to Work (PTW) boundary limit

A near miss occurred when a third-party contractor working removed a trip hazard from the vessel main deck, using a cutting torch and grinding disc.

Read more
Vital safety information (height of vehicle) found incorrect

“Height of vehicle” information displayed on a truck, was found to be incorrect.

Read more

IMCA Safety Flashes summarise key safety matters and incidents, allowing lessons to be more easily learnt for the benefit of the entire offshore industry.

The effectiveness of the IMCA Safety Flash system depends on the industry sharing information and so avoiding repeat incidents. Incidents are classified according to IOGP's Life Saving Rules.

All information is anonymised or sanitised, as appropriate, and warnings for graphic content included where possible.

IMCA makes every effort to ensure both the accuracy and reliability of the information shared, but is not be liable for any guidance and/or recommendation and/or statement herein contained.

The information contained in this document does not fulfil or replace any individual's or Member's legal, regulatory or other duties or obligations in respect of their operations. Individuals and Members remain solely responsible for the safe, lawful and proper conduct of their operations.

Share your safety incidents with IMCA online. Sign-up to receive Safety Flashes straight to your email.