Corrosion damage: Failed fire hydrant
- Safety Flash
- Published on 20 December 2016
- Generated on 4 July 2025
- IMCA SF 35/16
- 3 minute read
A member has reported an incident in which a fire hydrant valve failed under pressure.
What happened?
The incident occurred during testing of the helideck firefighting system. A hydrant valve assembly on the starboard side of the main deck failed under pressure. The 2kg valve assembly struck the deck head approximately 2 metres above, chipping paint on impact, and then fell to the deck below. No-one was injured. Whilst no-one was in the immediate area, the impact was heard by several people. The force associated with the hydrant valve assembly failure had the potential to cause a significant injury or fatality.
Failed studs
Where the incident occurred
Our member’s investigation revealed the following:
- There was an unexpected failure of the hydrant valve assembly studs. These studs were of type 303 Stainless Steel.
- Expert analysis reveals that type 303 Stainless Steel is particularly susceptible to stress corrosion cracking (SCC) in a high ambient temperature (tropical environment).
- The failure of the studs may have been accelerated by the presence of water surge, or water hammer, in the fire-fighting water system when activating the helideck firewater system.
- Metallurgic analysis examined both “failed” and “non-failed” studs were provided by the vessel. The report stated that the cause of failure was chloride induced SCC, which is a common failure mode for austenitic stainless steels, including types 303, 304, and 316.
- SCC failures commonly occur in tropical environments at ambient conditions for SS 303 and 304 grades, particularly for items under tensile stress and where the item has been cold worked. The report stated that all type 303 studs, regardless of exposure internally to raw seawater or externally to seawater spray would have eventually experienced complete fracture through SCC.
- Equipment on vessels operating in tropical environments, exposed to relatively high environmental temperatures, will be exposed to increased risk of SCC. Austenitic stainless steels (grades 303 and 304 in particular) will fail from SCC in relatively short periods of time.
- A contributing factor to the incident was the incorrect operation of the fire-fighting system inducing water surges or hammer into the fire main.
- The root cause of this incident was the incorrect material specification of the studs for the environment and application.
Our member took the following actions:
- Careful consideration given to the increased likelihood of SCC in stainless steel for vessels operating extensively in tropical or high temperature environments, particularly for vessels designed and built in temperate climates.
- All affected studs on fire hydrants to be replaced.
Related Safety Flashes
-
IMCA SF 22/15
15 December 2015
-
IMCA SF 04/14
4 April 2014
-
IMCA SF 09/07
31 October 2007
IMCA Safety Flashes summarise key safety matters and incidents, allowing lessons to be more easily learnt for the benefit of the entire offshore industry.
The effectiveness of the IMCA Safety Flash system depends on the industry sharing information and so avoiding repeat incidents. Incidents are classified according to IOGP's Life Saving Rules.
All information is anonymised or sanitised, as appropriate, and warnings for graphic content included where possible.
IMCA makes every effort to ensure both the accuracy and reliability of the information shared, but is not be liable for any guidance and/or recommendation and/or statement herein contained.
The information contained in this document does not fulfil or replace any individual's or Member's legal, regulatory or other duties or obligations in respect of their operations. Individuals and Members remain solely responsible for the safe, lawful and proper conduct of their operations.
Share your safety incidents with IMCA online. Sign-up to receive Safety Flashes straight to your email.