Thruster full failure
- DP Event
- Published on 25 August 2021
- Generated on 2 December 2024
- DPE 04/21
- 4 minute read
Drill Scenario
Jump to:
Explore our drill scenario on the action required to recover a vessel into a controllable condition following a thruster failure to full thrust.
DP emergency drill scenarios are included to assist DP vessel management and DPOs / Engineers and ETOs to conduct DP drills onboard. The intent is that the template can be used on any DP vessel, so specific details regarding the technical outcome are not included.
The benefit of using this template is to monitor and learn from the human reactions of key DP personnel. It is also important that the crew are familiar with various DP system set-ups including their failure modes.
Refer to Code of practice for the training and experience of key DP personnel – Appendix six (IMCA M117).
Exercise scenario: Thruster full failure
Objective:
To familiarise all vessel crew with what actions are required in order to recover the vessel into a controllable condition following a thruster failure to full thrust.
Method:
This test can be undertaken when the vessel is in a safe open space with no risk of excessive position
excursion causing an unsafe condition.
If the vessel has CPP Main thrusters carry out using CPP:
- Settle vessel on auto DP.
- A second person to take the most powerful thruster into manual control.
- Ramp that thruster to 100% in a direction perpendicular (if azimuth thruster) to the Auto DP thrust. If
carrying out for CPP, put CPP thrust in the opposite direction. - Observe effects.
Observations during drill:
- Does the DP Control system compensate?
- Is there an initial excursion?
- What action would the DPO take?
- Is the degree of participation and diligence of Key DP Personnel as expected.
Discussion points (post-exercise):
Vessel:
- How are the thrusters placed on the vessel? Where single skeg thrusters are fitted, what are the
implications of this failing to full thrust? This failure may still be within the FMEA Stated WCFDI. - Can a forward retractable azimuth thruster, counteract two bow tunnel thrusters?
- Powerful stern CPP propellors – if one failed to full thrust, is position compromised?
- Where rudders are used for position control, consider if the prop fails to full thrust and the rudder
still follows a DP command.
Human factors:
- What should the response of the DPO?
- What would be the worst-case scenario?
- Discuss the alternative actions/reactions that may occur in response to a similar scenario. Are there
multiple paths to a successful resolution or is there a preferred solution? Why?
Review of DPO and other key DP personnel reaction:
- What potential gaps in the existing DP familiarisation programme have been highlighted as a result of
the exercise? - What changes/revisions should be considered for the training and familiarisation procedures?
Review the applicable checklists (ASOG CAM/TAM/DP operations Manual/bridge and engine room checklists/FMEA/DP Annual Trials programmes/etc.)
- What additional necessary actions and considerations should be addressed?
- What potential changes should be made to make the checklists more appropriate?
- What additional necessary operating conditions and parameters should be considered?
- What potential changes should be considered to make Decision Support Tools more applicable to the
vessel and her equipment? - How would these changes improve/affect the vessel’s capabilities and limitations?
Conclusion:
Based on the results of the exercise and related discussions before and after, any suggestions for follow up
including any corrective actions deemed appropriate should be accurately detailed and managed to close out.
Handling of thruster system failures in the correct manner requires knowledge of the DP vessel control, how
the DP system reacts to failures and alarms and the human intervention required if necessary, to ensure
station keeping.
Items to consider include:
- Awareness of the current thrust levels and directions.
- DP system reaction to failures.
- Appropriateness of communication.
- Training requirements.
Related IMCA Guidance
Latest DP incidents
-
Prepare for 2025 solar activity
This case study covers events that occurred on the same vessel, eight months apart.
DPE 02/24
29 July 2024
Undesired event
-
Know your vessel capabilities and when to stop!
An incident that occurred on an equipment class 2 MODU, during well intervention operations.
DPE 02/24
29 July 2024
Incident
-
Duty/not duty, which is the question?
With no steering control of the port azimuth thruster, and no other thrusters operational, the heading of the FPU could not be maintained.
DPE 02/24
29 July 2024
Undesired event
-
You’ve got the ASOG, so now you’ve got to follow it
This case study examines an incident that occurred on an equipment class 2 MODU, during well intervention operations.
DPE 02/24
29 July 2024
Incident
-
Button trouble
A Dynamically Positioned vessel experienced a loss of Dynamic Positioning (DP) control while installing cable within a wind farm.
DPE 01/24
3 April 2024
Incident
The case studies and observations above have been compiled from information received by IMCA. All vessel, client, and operational data has been removed from the narrative to ensure anonymity. Case studies are not intended as guidance on the safe conduct of operations, but rather to assist vessel managers, DP operators, and technical crew.
IMCA makes every effort to ensure both the accuracy and reliability of the information, but it is not liable for any guidance and/or recommendation and/or statement herein contained.
Any queries should be directed to DP team at IMCA. Share your DP incidents with IMCA online. Sign-up to receive DP event bulletins straight to your email.