Lack of maintenance caused a problem involving the bus tie breaker
- DP Event
- Published on 27 February 2018
- Generated on 4 November 2026
- DPE 01/18
- 2 minute read
Undesired event
The maintenance requirements of some major DP components were not included in the vessel's computerised Planned Maintenance System.
Comments
The power management system was set for semi-automatic mode as required for DP2 operations.
Uncontrolled and unsynchronised closure of the bus tie breaker resulted in simultaneous trip of DG1 and DG3 with a consequence that the forward thrusters tripped.
Based on conclusions from the technical analysis, the primary reason (root cause) of the event had been identified as lack of maintenance of the DP critical system(s) more precisely the bus tie breaker.
The ship was provided with a computerised planned maintenance system (PMS) which should cover all maintenance activity on board. The maintenance requirements of some major DP components were not included in the PMS.
Considerations
- From the information supplied, there was minimal DP stabilisation period allowed for at the start of the operation or following recovery when the vessel again engaged DP control.
- It took 18 minutes to restore both forward thrusters – could this have been achieved more quickly?
- It is assumed that a partial blackout occurred, causing loss of both forward thrusters – normally the thrusters would be arranged such that the worst case failure (WCF) would cause the loss of one forward and one aft thruster.
- It appears that the control of the thrusters was taken manually, however it should be questioned whether the automatic DP system or JSAH would have maintained the vessel in position.
- While post-failure recovery time is definitely an issue, it seems that vessel design and operating configuration could be the root causes.
- The event does highlight the importance of identifying and maintaining all items of critical operational equipment.
Latest DP incidents
-
Watch what you are pressing
While transiting away from a wind farm, the Master of a DP equipment class 2 vessel observed that the vessel was operating in Backup Mode and queried this with the bridge team and attending electrician
DPE 03/26
19 October 2026
Incident
-
The domino effect
The event demonstrates the importance of maintaining the approved DP power configuration, addressing known defects before equipment is relied upon during DP operations, and ensuring DP personnel understand how changes to the generating arrangement can affect redundancy and failure propagation
DPE 03/26
19 October 2026
Incident
-
Lost in calibration
During activity associated with calibration of a vessel Vertical Reference Unit (VRU), the DP control system experienced degradation of its attitude reference arrangement. Shortly afterwards, the vessel generated an Off Position Warning followed by an Off Position Alarm
DPE 03/26
19 October 2026
Incident
-
The UPS and downs
While a vessel was transiting in DP mode, the DPO observed the loss of Gyros 2 and 3 together with alarms from a 230V backup power supply. The telephone system remained powered but was inoperable.
DPE 03/26
19 October 2026
Incident
-
DP drill scenario – Consequence Analysis Class DP2 & DP3
DP drill scenario – Consequence Analysis Class DP2 & DP3
DPE 03/26
19 October 2026
Drill Scenario
The case studies and observations above have been compiled from information received by IMCA. All vessel, client, and operational data has been removed from the narrative to ensure anonymity. Case studies are not intended as guidance on the safe conduct of operations, but rather to assist vessel managers, DP operators, and technical crew.
IMCA makes every effort to ensure both the accuracy and reliability of the information, but it is not liable for any guidance and/or recommendation and/or statement herein contained.
Any queries should be directed to DP team at IMCA. Share your DP incidents with IMCA online. Sign-up to receive DP event bulletins straight to your email.