Load sharing imbalance causes loss of position
- DP Event
- Published on 29 March 2017
- Generated on 5 November 2026
- DPE 01/17
- 2 minute read
Incident
The vessel’s DP operations manual and well specific operating guidelines (WSOG) must be questioned.
Comments
The power plant was configured to work in closed bus mode. No.2 port, No.2 centre and No.2 starboard generator were online. No.1 port and No.1 centre generator were on standby. No.1 starboard generator was on long term isolation due to turbocharger overhaul.
The vessel’s power management system (PMS) developed a fault in an I/O module for No.2 centre generator. This fault caused the generator circuit breaker status to freeze in the ‘closed’ position. The alarm indicated a generator fault causing the engineer to disconnect the faulty generator.
The breaker opened on the generator and due to the fault on the I/O module the status of the breaker was still showing connected and a load sharing imbalance was noticed by the PMS which attempted to correct it. As the disconnected generator could not take any load, the imbalance persisted and the PMS drove the bus frequency down to the point where it triggered the frequency based thrust limitation function on all thrusters leading to loss of position and an emergency disconnect.
Considerations
- It is recommended that the failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) should consider the PMS interface so that this type of failure mode is identified.
- It would appear the PMS was not properly tested for operations in closed bus tie operations.
- The fact that frequency issues occurred suggests advance generator protection was either not present or not functioning correctly.
- The vessel’s DP operations manual and well specific operating guidelines (WSOG) must be questioned.
- The value of the current factor (3.9kts) should be questioned.
- It should be noted that when thrusters are operated via the IJS they are still under the control of the PMS.
Latest DP incidents
-
Watch what you are pressing
While transiting away from a wind farm, the Master of a DP equipment class 2 vessel observed that the vessel was operating in Backup Mode and queried this with the bridge team and attending electrician
DPE 03/26
19 October 2026
Incident
-
The domino effect
The event demonstrates the importance of maintaining the approved DP power configuration, addressing known defects before equipment is relied upon during DP operations, and ensuring DP personnel understand how changes to the generating arrangement can affect redundancy and failure propagation
DPE 03/26
19 October 2026
Incident
-
Lost in calibration
During activity associated with calibration of a vessel Vertical Reference Unit (VRU), the DP control system experienced degradation of its attitude reference arrangement. Shortly afterwards, the vessel generated an Off Position Warning followed by an Off Position Alarm
DPE 03/26
19 October 2026
Incident
-
The UPS and downs
While a vessel was transiting in DP mode, the DPO observed the loss of Gyros 2 and 3 together with alarms from a 230V backup power supply. The telephone system remained powered but was inoperable.
DPE 03/26
19 October 2026
Incident
-
DP drill scenario – Consequence Analysis Class DP2 & DP3
DP drill scenario – Consequence Analysis Class DP2 & DP3
DPE 03/26
19 October 2026
Drill Scenario
The case studies and observations above have been compiled from information received by IMCA. All vessel, client, and operational data has been removed from the narrative to ensure anonymity. Case studies are not intended as guidance on the safe conduct of operations, but rather to assist vessel managers, DP operators, and technical crew.
IMCA makes every effort to ensure both the accuracy and reliability of the information, but it is not liable for any guidance and/or recommendation and/or statement herein contained.
Any queries should be directed to DP team at IMCA. Share your DP incidents with IMCA online. Sign-up to receive DP event bulletins straight to your email.