Loss of DGNSS resulted in ROV being recovered
- DP Event
- Published on 2 June 2017
- Generated on 30 October 2026
- DPE 02/17
- 2 minute read
Incident
When considering redundancy of satellite systems do not just consider the manufacturer, but also correction type and transmission method.
Comments
Both the satellite positioning systems in use were from the same provider.
The report recognised this and recommended that the systems were changed so that position information was provided by different service providers.
The service provider informed the operator after the event that its services experienced periods of increased latencies for just over twenty minutes on the day and time of the incident.
Considerations
- It would appear from the information available that the standby hydroacoustic position reference (HPR) system did not have an acoustic transponder on the seabed. In any event it was not utilised.
- Proper consideration should always be made of the required PRS based on the specific operation and the DP equipment class of the vessel.
- When considering redundancy of satellite systems do not just consider equipment manufacturer and software versions; the correction type and transmission method should also be different.
- It is noted that two separate vendors could use correction details from the same source, therefore users should compare what correction type is being used.
- In similar situations users could consider switching to raw global navigation satellite system (GNSS) data, therefore staying on DP but with a larger footprint.
Latest DP incidents
-
The domino effect
The event demonstrates the importance of maintaining the approved DP power configuration, addressing known defects before equipment is relied upon during DP operations, and ensuring DP personnel understand how changes to the generating arrangement can affect redundancy and failure propagation
DPE 03/26
19 October 2026
Incident
-
Lost in calibration
During activity associated with calibration of a vessel Vertical Reference Unit (VRU), the DP control system experienced degradation of its attitude reference arrangement. Shortly afterwards, the vessel generated an Off Position Warning followed by an Off Position Alarm
DPE 03/26
19 October 2026
Incident
-
Watch what you are pressing
While transiting away from a wind farm, the Master of a DP equipment class 2 vessel observed that the vessel was operating in Backup Mode and queried this with the bridge team and attending electrician
DPE 03/26
19 October 2026
Incident
-
DP drill scenario – Consequence Analysis Class DP2 & DP3
DP drill scenario – Consequence Analysis Class DP2 & DP3
DPE 03/26
19 October 2026
Drill Scenario
-
The UPS and downs
While a vessel was transiting in DP mode, the DPO observed the loss of Gyros 2 and 3 together with alarms from a 230V backup power supply. The telephone system remained powered but was inoperable.
DPE 03/26
19 October 2026
Incident
The case studies and observations above have been compiled from information received by IMCA. All vessel, client, and operational data has been removed from the narrative to ensure anonymity. Case studies are not intended as guidance on the safe conduct of operations, but rather to assist vessel managers, DP operators, and technical crew.
IMCA makes every effort to ensure both the accuracy and reliability of the information, but it is not liable for any guidance and/or recommendation and/or statement herein contained.
Any queries should be directed to DP team at IMCA. Share your DP incidents with IMCA online. Sign-up to receive DP event bulletins straight to your email.