Relative PRS – a reflection
- DP Event
- Published on 11 August 2022
- Generated on 13 December 2024
- DPE 02/22
- 2 minute read
Incident
The laser based relative position reference had switched to another target – the reflective tape on the crane hook.
Quote
A PSV was conducting cargo operations alongside an FPSO which was moving around its moored position.
Selected into DP Control were two DGNSS absolute references and one Laser based relative reference, there were no other available relative references for the DPO to select. The DP control system was selected to ‘Follow Target’ mode.
During a lift from the deck of the PSV, the vessel thrusters suddenly ramped up and the vessel started to move off position. The DPO switched the DP control into joystick manual heading control to stabilise the vessel and move out of the 500m zone.
What happened?
The laser based relative position reference had switched to another target, in this instance the reflective tape on the crane hook.
As there was only one relative reference available and selected this caused the DP control to move the vessel off the original position.
What can be concluded?
The following can be concluded:
- There was no redundancy for relative position reference.
- The Laser target appears to have been positioned in the wrong location. Targets should be located clear of crane operations and personnel with reflecting jackets moving around.
Additional comments
- If the DP control system was in Follow Target mode, the DGNSS should have been in “monitoring” and Relative PRS in “Mobile” configuration. The actual setup during the event in unclear.
- The DP event report did not discuss the use of any decision support tools such as ASOG.
- Guidelines on position reference systems and sensors for DP operations (IMCA M252), Section 4.6, details specific operational considerations for laser position references including placement of the sensors and reflectors and the hazards to consider.
Latest DP incidents
-
Prepare for 2025 solar activity
This case study covers events that occurred on the same vessel, eight months apart.
DPE 02/24
29 July 2024
Undesired event
-
Know your vessel capabilities and when to stop!
An incident that occurred on an equipment class 2 MODU, during well intervention operations.
DPE 02/24
29 July 2024
Incident
-
Duty/not duty, which is the question?
With no steering control of the port azimuth thruster, and no other thrusters operational, the heading of the FPU could not be maintained.
DPE 02/24
29 July 2024
Undesired event
-
You’ve got the ASOG, so now you’ve got to follow it
This case study examines an incident that occurred on an equipment class 2 MODU, during well intervention operations.
DPE 02/24
29 July 2024
Incident
-
Button trouble
A Dynamically Positioned vessel experienced a loss of Dynamic Positioning (DP) control while installing cable within a wind farm.
DPE 01/24
3 April 2024
Incident
The case studies and observations above have been compiled from information received by IMCA. All vessel, client, and operational data has been removed from the narrative to ensure anonymity. Case studies are not intended as guidance on the safe conduct of operations, but rather to assist vessel managers, DP operators, and technical crew.
IMCA makes every effort to ensure both the accuracy and reliability of the information, but it is not liable for any guidance and/or recommendation and/or statement herein contained.
Any queries should be directed to DP team at IMCA. Share your DP incidents with IMCA online. Sign-up to receive DP event bulletins straight to your email.