Relative PRS – a reflection
- DP Event
- Published on 11 August 2022
- Generated on 11 November 2026
- DPE 02/22
- 2 minute read
Incident
The laser based relative position reference had switched to another target – the reflective tape on the crane hook.
Quote
A PSV was conducting cargo operations alongside an FPSO which was moving around its moored position.
Selected into DP Control were two DGNSS absolute references and one Laser based relative reference, there were no other available relative references for the DPO to select. The DP control system was selected to ‘Follow Target’ mode.
During a lift from the deck of the PSV, the vessel thrusters suddenly ramped up and the vessel started to move off position. The DPO switched the DP control into joystick manual heading control to stabilise the vessel and move out of the 500m zone.
What happened?
The laser based relative position reference had switched to another target, in this instance the reflective tape on the crane hook.
As there was only one relative reference available and selected this caused the DP control to move the vessel off the original position.
What can be concluded?
The following can be concluded:
- There was no redundancy for relative position reference.
- The Laser target appears to have been positioned in the wrong location. Targets should be located clear of crane operations and personnel with reflecting jackets moving around.
Additional comments
- If the DP control system was in Follow Target mode, the DGNSS should have been in “monitoring” and Relative PRS in “Mobile” configuration. The actual setup during the event in unclear.
- The DP event report did not discuss the use of any decision support tools such as ASOG.
- Guidelines on position reference systems and sensors for DP operations (IMCA M252), Section 4.6, details specific operational considerations for laser position references including placement of the sensors and reflectors and the hazards to consider.
Latest DP incidents
-
Watch what you are pressing
While transiting away from a wind farm, the Master of a DP equipment class 2 vessel observed that the vessel was operating in Backup Mode and queried this with the bridge team and attending electrician
DPE 03/26
19 October 2026
Incident
-
The domino effect
The event demonstrates the importance of maintaining the approved DP power configuration, addressing known defects before equipment is relied upon during DP operations, and ensuring DP personnel understand how changes to the generating arrangement can affect redundancy and failure propagation
DPE 03/26
19 October 2026
Incident
-
Lost in calibration
During activity associated with calibration of a vessel Vertical Reference Unit (VRU), the DP control system experienced degradation of its attitude reference arrangement. Shortly afterwards, the vessel generated an Off Position Warning followed by an Off Position Alarm
DPE 03/26
19 October 2026
Incident
-
The UPS and downs
While a vessel was transiting in DP mode, the DPO observed the loss of Gyros 2 and 3 together with alarms from a 230V backup power supply. The telephone system remained powered but was inoperable.
DPE 03/26
19 October 2026
Incident
-
DP drill scenario – Consequence Analysis Class DP2 & DP3
DP drill scenario – Consequence Analysis Class DP2 & DP3
DPE 03/26
19 October 2026
Drill Scenario
The case studies and observations above have been compiled from information received by IMCA. All vessel, client, and operational data has been removed from the narrative to ensure anonymity. Case studies are not intended as guidance on the safe conduct of operations, but rather to assist vessel managers, DP operators, and technical crew.
IMCA makes every effort to ensure both the accuracy and reliability of the information, but it is not liable for any guidance and/or recommendation and/or statement herein contained.
Any queries should be directed to DP team at IMCA. Share your DP incidents with IMCA online. Sign-up to receive DP event bulletins straight to your email.