Worn components create unwanted thrust
- DP Event
- Published on 25 August 2021
- Generated on 11 September 2026
- DPE 03/21
- 2 minute read
Incident
Jump to:
A worn key within the coupling of the step motor caused unwanted travel of the thruster pitch. The vessel was forced to return to port.
Comments
It was found that a worn key within the coupling of the step motor (providing feedback) caused unwanted travel of the thruster pitch. The vessel was forced to return to port to source a spare part, a ‘used but good’ part was located and fitted.
Considerations
- In most direct driven CPP systems there are some failures that can lead to uncontrolled thrust and the
emergency stop needs to be employed by the DPO, before the excursion becomes too significant. DPOs should not hesitate to use the emergency stop on thrusters if thruster alarms indicate a thruster control issue. - Use of a “second hand” part might be acceptable as a temporary stop gap measure, provided that the part is still within specification.
- This event highlights the need to annually check and test controllable pitch propellers.
IMCA M190 Chapter 4.0 Paragraph 4.10:
“There are many ways in which a variable speed thruster can fail, but the failure effects are generally safe. For vessels with variable speed thrusters of proven reliability, it may be acceptable to carry out the control loop wire break tests on a rolling programme where all tests are carried out over a five-year period. Controllable pitch propellers should be tested annually.“ - Although not related to the event, the number of references is inadequate. IMO MSC Circ. 645, IMO MSC.1 Circ. 1580, and IMCA M252, Guidance on position reference systems and sensors for DP operations guidance documents state that for DP 2 or 3 operations:
“There is a requirement for three independent position references based on two different principles to be simultaneously available during operation.”
Latest DP incidents
-
Holding position, losing references
While approaching a turret-moored, weather-vaning offshore installation (FPSO), in preparation for cargo operations, a DP equipment class 2 vessel experienced significant rolling of up to 15–20° due to a long-period swell close to the vessel’s natural roll period, resulting in a resonance effect
DPE 02/26
1 September 2026
Observation
-
Know your equipment, or at least where to find the answers
During an update in the Follow Target Mode, the crew noticed an anomaly with joystick control.
DPE 02/26
1 September 2026
Observation
-
A chain of small failures leads to a major consequence
While conducting cargo operations on DP a vessel experienced a partial blackout caused by an unexpected shutdown of generator 3
DPE 02/26
1 September 2026
Incident
-
New equipment, unexpected consequences
During the operation, a loss of DGNSS correction signals was experienced across multiple vessel DGNSS units.
DPE 02/26
1 September 2026
Incident
-
DP drill scenario – Loss of seawater cooling pump redundancy
Exercise scenario – Loss of seawater cooling pump redundancy
DPE 02/26
1 September 2026
Drill Scenario
The case studies and observations above have been compiled from information received by IMCA. All vessel, client, and operational data has been removed from the narrative to ensure anonymity. Case studies are not intended as guidance on the safe conduct of operations, but rather to assist vessel managers, DP operators, and technical crew.
IMCA makes every effort to ensure both the accuracy and reliability of the information, but it is not liable for any guidance and/or recommendation and/or statement herein contained.
Any queries should be directed to DP team at IMCA. Share your DP incidents with IMCA online. Sign-up to receive DP event bulletins straight to your email.