Worn components create unwanted thrust
- DP Event
- Published on 25 August 2021
- Generated on 15 June 2026
- DPE 03/21
- 2 minute read
Incident
A worn key within the coupling of the step motor caused unwanted travel of the thruster pitch. The vessel was forced to return to port.
Comments
It was found that a worn key within the coupling of the step motor (providing feedback) caused unwanted travel of the thruster pitch. The vessel was forced to return to port to source a spare part, a ‘used but good’ part was located and fitted.
Considerations
- In most direct driven CPP systems there are some failures that can lead to uncontrolled thrust and the
emergency stop needs to be employed by the DPO, before the excursion becomes too significant. DPOs should not hesitate to use the emergency stop on thrusters if thruster alarms indicate a thruster control issue. - Use of a “second hand” part might be acceptable as a temporary stop gap measure, provided that the part is still within specification.
- This event highlights the need to annually check and test controllable pitch propellers.
IMCA M190 Chapter 4.0 Paragraph 4.10:
“There are many ways in which a variable speed thruster can fail, but the failure effects are generally safe. For vessels with variable speed thrusters of proven reliability, it may be acceptable to carry out the control loop wire break tests on a rolling programme where all tests are carried out over a five-year period. Controllable pitch propellers should be tested annually.“ - Although not related to the event, the number of references is inadequate. IMO MSC Circ. 645, IMO MSC.1 Circ. 1580, and IMCA M252, Guidance on position reference systems and sensors for DP operations guidance documents state that for DP 2 or 3 operations:
“There is a requirement for three independent position references based on two different principles to be simultaneously available during operation.”
Latest DP incidents
-
Think twice. Press once!
On a DP equipment class 2 supply vessel engaged in drilling, an incident occurred due to lack of operational knowledge
DPE 01/26
11 May 2026
Incident
-
Network issues, not a thing of the past
A DP equipment class 3 vessel was engaged in saturation diving activities, with two divers in the water when this DP incident occurred.
DPE 01/26
11 May 2026
Incident
-
All swept up
A DP equipment class 2 vessel was engaged in rock placement operations, within close proximity to a structure, when this event occurred.
DPE 01/26
11 May 2026
Undesired event
-
Hybrid system won't accept load
A DP equipment class 2 vessel was engaged in operations whilst holding position on auto DP, when this undesired event occurred
DPE 01/26
11 May 2026
Undesired event
-
DP drill scenario – Loss of main DP system UPS
The objective of this scenario is to identify risks and impacts of losing the main DP system uninterruptible power supply, possibilities to reduce that risk and suitable actions to be taken if such an occurrence happened.
DPE 01/26
11 May 2026
Drill Scenario
The case studies and observations above have been compiled from information received by IMCA. All vessel, client, and operational data has been removed from the narrative to ensure anonymity. Case studies are not intended as guidance on the safe conduct of operations, but rather to assist vessel managers, DP operators, and technical crew.
IMCA makes every effort to ensure both the accuracy and reliability of the information, but it is not liable for any guidance and/or recommendation and/or statement herein contained.
Any queries should be directed to DP team at IMCA. Share your DP incidents with IMCA online. Sign-up to receive DP event bulletins straight to your email.