Damage to crane winch

  • Safety Flash
  • Published on 18 January 2013
  • Generated on 16 August 2025
  • IMCA SF 01/13
  • 3 minute read

A Member has reported an incident in which a crane winch was badly damaged and the load dropped as a result. 

What happened?

The incident occurred on a vessel when the crane was being used to deploy a small boat for personnel transfer.

The crane operator started the crane and also disabled the limit switch. Whilst one of the riggers on deck connected the hook to the small boat, another rigger (banksman) gave the signal to the crane operator to start heaving up. Two tag lines were connected to help control the movement of the small boat. The crane operator heaved up till the ‘headache ball’ touched the limit switch weight, then the rigger (banksman) signalled for the operator to swing the boom to the port side and over the bulwarks.

It was observed that, when the small boat was situated 2-3 metres above the water, it was still not clear from the vessel’s fenders. The crane operator extended the boom in order to clear the boat from the fenders; however, as the headache ball was already against the stopper, tension was placed on the winch drum sufficient enough so as to cause it to break from its foundation bolts. As a result, the boat fell into water and the crane block fell into the boat. There were no injuries, as no one was in the boat at the time.

Findings

Our Member’s investigation revealed the following:

  • The vessel initially had one crane operator on board and, two weeks before the incident, had switched to 24-hour operations which required the use of a second crane operator.

  • The limit switch for the crane was disabled by the crane operator without prior approval from the officer in charge of the watch. The more senior crane operator onboard revealed that he normally disables the limit switch for the crane as this causes a nuisance every time the crane shuts off when the vessel is rolling.

  • Internal company checklists were not followed.

  • The crane operator had full visibility on the lift and the crane block from the crane cabin.

  • A toolbox meeting and risk assessment for lifting operations had been conducted and was in place, although some specific control measures within the risk assessment were not complied with.

  • The crane operator extended the boom without observing that the block was already heaved to the maximum level.

Lessons learnt

The following lessons were learnt:

  • As part of a planned maintenance programme, functionality of crane limit switches should be regularly tested

  • Alarms on the switch limits should not be altered without approval.

  • Crane limit switches should be checked and calibrated only by competent persons.

  • Full induction and training should be given to crane operators for the specific crane type being used, with crane operator competency assessed by an agreed third party company.

  • There should only be one identified banksman for each shift, who should be provided with special vest for easy identification.

  • Always ensure communications (including hand signals and radio) are tested prior to starting operations.

Members should refer to the following IMCA publications for further information:

Latest Safety Flashes:

Brazil: diver permanently disabled after decompression illness

Conviction of diving company upheld as work accident suffered by a diver who lost strength in his upper limbs and the ability to move, requiring permanent use of a wheelchair.

Read more
Diver reports unwell post-dive: non-decompression illness

A diver experienced a dizzy spell about one hour after completing a diving operation

Read more
Shore-side crane boom collides with vessel mast

During shipyard lifting operations, the boom of a dock crane made contact with the vessel mast.

Read more
Injury sustained while operating steel lifting magnet

While preparing to transfer steel plates using a steel lifting magnet, a crew person was injured.

Read more
Head Injury in Engine Room

A Chief Engineer sustained a head laceration injury.

Read more

IMCA Safety Flashes summarise key safety matters and incidents, allowing lessons to be more easily learnt for the benefit of the entire offshore industry.

The effectiveness of the IMCA Safety Flash system depends on the industry sharing information and so avoiding repeat incidents. Incidents are classified according to IOGP's Life Saving Rules.

All information is anonymised or sanitised, as appropriate, and warnings for graphic content included where possible.

IMCA makes every effort to ensure both the accuracy and reliability of the information shared, but is not be liable for any guidance and/or recommendation and/or statement herein contained.

The information contained in this document does not fulfil or replace any individual's or Member's legal, regulatory or other duties or obligations in respect of their operations. Individuals and Members remain solely responsible for the safe, lawful and proper conduct of their operations.

Share your safety incidents with IMCA online. Sign-up to receive Safety Flashes straight to your email.