Failure of life rafts during servicing

  • Safety Flash
  • Published on 14 July 2010
  • Generated on 2 December 2024
  • IMCA SF 04/10
  • 2 minute read

A member has reported an incident in which four life rafts sent ashore for annual servicing had to be condemned and replaced.

What happened?

The rafts had been serviced by a sub-contractor in the previous year and no defects were noted. Subsequently it was found that that sub-contractor had lost its license and certification as a life rafting testing station.

Images of damaged life rafts

Images of damaged life rafts

The following defects were discovered:

  • The four rafts were found to be suffering from water ingress and corrosion.
  • Severe oxidation was found on 20% of the buoyancy chambers, moderate oxidation on 10% of the total area and 35% of the canopy.
  • On one raft the protective cover was missing from the inflation cylinder valve and the inflation tube was highly oxidised.
  • When the International Maritime Organization (IMO) inflation test was carried out, leaks were observed and the buoyancy chambers burst near the connections of the survival pack and connections to the inflation cylinders.

The rafts would not have worked in the event of an emergency, potentially leaving the vessel crew with no means of escape.

The following recommendations were made:

  • All life-saving equipment should be inspected closely following shore-side servicing to verify that the servicing indicated has been properly and thoroughly carried out. Some clear pointers to assist in this process could be:
    • Life raft sealing bands show signs of having been replaced
    • Evidence of talcum powder on exposed runner of life rafts indicates that the raft was opened and additional talcum powder was applied during repacking
    • Service labels updated on life raft wallet.

Latest Safety Flashes:

LTI: Finger injury during emergency recovery of ROV

A worker suffered a serious finger injury when their finger was caught between a crane wire and the recovery hook on an ROV.

Read more
BSEE: recurring hand injuries from alternative cutting devices

The United States Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE) has published Safety Alert 487.

Read more
NTSB: Crane wire failure

The National Transportation Safety Board of the United States (NTSB) published "Safer Seas Digest 2023".

Read more
Hot work performed outside of Permit to Work (PTW) boundary limit

A near miss occurred when a third-party contractor working removed a trip hazard from the vessel main deck, using a cutting torch and grinding disc.

Read more
Vital safety information (height of vehicle) found incorrect

“Height of vehicle” information displayed on a truck, was found to be incorrect.

Read more

IMCA Safety Flashes summarise key safety matters and incidents, allowing lessons to be more easily learnt for the benefit of the entire offshore industry.

The effectiveness of the IMCA Safety Flash system depends on the industry sharing information and so avoiding repeat incidents. Incidents are classified according to IOGP's Life Saving Rules.

All information is anonymised or sanitised, as appropriate, and warnings for graphic content included where possible.

IMCA makes every effort to ensure both the accuracy and reliability of the information shared, but is not be liable for any guidance and/or recommendation and/or statement herein contained.

The information contained in this document does not fulfil or replace any individual's or Member's legal, regulatory or other duties or obligations in respect of their operations. Individuals and Members remain solely responsible for the safe, lawful and proper conduct of their operations.

Share your safety incidents with IMCA online. Sign-up to receive Safety Flashes straight to your email.