Electric shock incident

  • Safety Flash
  • Published on 20 March 2015
  • Generated on 5 November 2026
  • IMCA SF 04/15
  • 2 minute read

A Member has reported an incident in which a ship’s electrician received a 220V AC shock. 

What happened?

The incident occurred when working on a 24V remote input/output (RIO) module on joy-stick electrical equipment. The electric shock was transmitted from the left hand to right hand due to the fact that the path of least resistance was across the body and to ground through the factory fitted anti-static earth strap. The electrician suffered minor burns to the left hand.

Instrument cabinet

Instrument cabinet

Anti static earth strap

Anti-static earth strap

Module that was to be replaced

Module that was to be replaced

White cable that touched the electricians hand causing electric shock

White cable that touched the electricians hand causing electric shock

Our member noted the following:

  • Live conductors should not be present at worksites if the correct controls are in place, and advice from the manufacturers of electrical equipment is always properly followed.
  • Personal risk assessments were not adequate due to complacency in the task to be undertaken.
  • Harm could be caused to any person when they are exposed to ‘live parts’ that are either touched directly or indirectly by means of some conducting object or material.
  • Damage could be caused to electronic equipment when they are exposed to ‘live parts’ that are either touched directly or indirectly by means of some conducting object or material.
  • As part of the isolation process the equipment had to be checked to ensure electrical energy had been isolated or disconnected from its source, this should be done using a voltage tester/probe and compatible proving unit.
  • Although electrical tasks are undertaken on all members’ worksites on a regular basis, this incident acts as a reminder that live parts normal mains voltage, 230V AC, can cause; electrical burns, permanent injury and electric shocks, which can prove to be fatal.

Latest Safety Flashes:

Cyber-attack on vessel

An oil tanker suffered a cybersecurity incident.

Read more
MAIB: Normalising of unsafe practice – fatal man overboard incident

MAIB have published Accident Investigation Report 16/2026 into a fatal man overboard incident on board a bulk carrier offshore Sweden.

Read more
Dust explosion in Bow thruster motor

Upon activation of the bow thruster, there was a loud explosion within the forward section of the workboat.

Read more
Dropped bulk bag during loading operations

A dropped object incident occurred during quayside lifting when a bulk bag failed due to incorrect loading.

Read more
Failure of sea-fastening on the leg of a jack-up barge

During a sea passage, prevailing sea conditions caused a jack-up barge to experience rolling and pitching motions.

Read more

IMCA Safety Flashes summarise key safety matters and incidents, allowing lessons to be more easily learnt for the benefit of the entire offshore industry.

The effectiveness of the IMCA Safety Flash system depends on the industry sharing information and so avoiding repeat incidents. Incidents are classified according to IOGP's Life Saving Rules.

All information is anonymised or sanitised, as appropriate, and warnings for graphic content included where possible.

IMCA makes every effort to ensure both the accuracy and reliability of the information shared, but is not be liable for any guidance and/or recommendation and/or statement herein contained.

The information contained in this document does not fulfil or replace any individual's or Member's legal, regulatory or other duties or obligations in respect of their operations. Individuals and Members remain solely responsible for the safe, lawful and proper conduct of their operations.

Share your safety incidents with IMCA online. Sign-up to receive Safety Flashes straight to your email.