Electric shock incident

  • Safety Flash
  • Published on 20 March 2015
  • Generated on 23 July 2026
  • IMCA SF 04/15
  • 2 minute read

A Member has reported an incident in which a ship’s electrician received a 220V AC shock. 

What happened?

The incident occurred when working on a 24V remote input/output (RIO) module on joy-stick electrical equipment. The electric shock was transmitted from the left hand to right hand due to the fact that the path of least resistance was across the body and to ground through the factory fitted anti-static earth strap. The electrician suffered minor burns to the left hand.

Instrument cabinet

Instrument cabinet

Anti static earth strap

Anti-static earth strap

Module that was to be replaced

Module that was to be replaced

White cable that touched the electricians hand causing electric shock

White cable that touched the electricians hand causing electric shock

Our member noted the following:

  • Live conductors should not be present at worksites if the correct controls are in place, and advice from the manufacturers of electrical equipment is always properly followed.
  • Personal risk assessments were not adequate due to complacency in the task to be undertaken.
  • Harm could be caused to any person when they are exposed to ‘live parts’ that are either touched directly or indirectly by means of some conducting object or material.
  • Damage could be caused to electronic equipment when they are exposed to ‘live parts’ that are either touched directly or indirectly by means of some conducting object or material.
  • As part of the isolation process the equipment had to be checked to ensure electrical energy had been isolated or disconnected from its source, this should be done using a voltage tester/probe and compatible proving unit.
  • Although electrical tasks are undertaken on all members’ worksites on a regular basis, this incident acts as a reminder that live parts normal mains voltage, 230V AC, can cause; electrical burns, permanent injury and electric shocks, which can prove to be fatal.

Latest Safety Flashes:

MAIB: Catastrophic engine failure and subsequent fire

MAIB has published Accident Investigation Report 10/2026 into a catastrophic failure of a diesel generator engine on board the vessel Kommandor Susan.

Read more
BSEE: Compressed gas cylinder hazards

BSEE has published Safety Alert 516, relating to potential risks involving compressed gas cylinders.

Read more
MSF: dropped object inside vessel tank

MSF have published Safety Alert 26-05 relating to a tank cleaning machine coming lose and falling within a tank on a vessel.

Read more
Uncontrolled movement of cargo

During offshore cargo operations alongside a rig, a single pipe loaded on deck shifted due to vessel motion and swell conditions.

Read more
Positives – rubber seals on hatches, securing of shackle pins, fuel sample box

A Member reports a few positive findings.

Read more

IMCA Safety Flashes summarise key safety matters and incidents, allowing lessons to be more easily learnt for the benefit of the entire offshore industry.

The effectiveness of the IMCA Safety Flash system depends on the industry sharing information and so avoiding repeat incidents. Incidents are classified according to IOGP's Life Saving Rules.

All information is anonymised or sanitised, as appropriate, and warnings for graphic content included where possible.

IMCA makes every effort to ensure both the accuracy and reliability of the information shared, but is not be liable for any guidance and/or recommendation and/or statement herein contained.

The information contained in this document does not fulfil or replace any individual's or Member's legal, regulatory or other duties or obligations in respect of their operations. Individuals and Members remain solely responsible for the safe, lawful and proper conduct of their operations.

Share your safety incidents with IMCA online. Sign-up to receive Safety Flashes straight to your email.