High potential near miss: dropped object – spark arrestor

  • Safety Flash
  • Published on 20 February 2018
  • Generated on 26 July 2026
  • IMCA SF 04/18
  • 2 minute read

An 18kg spark arrestor fell 16 metres from the funnel stack and landed on the FRC deck.

What happened?

No-one was injured but this was considered a serious near miss. The spark arrestor was installed at the direction of the charterer only days before the incident. It was installed by a third-party sub-contractor; it was a requirement for working in the field and was new to the vessel.

18kg Spark Arrestor

What went wrong?

  • The spark arrestor became dislodged due to exhaust pressure and vibration.
  • The clamp was not secured tightly enough.
  • The mechanism of securing was pop rivets.
  • Vessel management did not manage the quality control of the third-party work when the spark arrestor was installed.

What were the causes?

  • A causal factor was:
    • installation (fixing) of the spark arrestor was not adequate or to industry standards and not quality checked by the vessel crew or management.
  • Root causes were:
    • failure of vessel operator to conduct a management of change (MoC) process for spark arrestor being installed.
    • the vessel operator did not follow contractor management procedures as the third-party installer was not contracted by the vessel.

What lessons were learnt?

  • There should be a management of change (MoC) process applied to all significant modifications or additions to vessel plant and equipment. This should include quality control to verify installation meets industry standards.
  • Contractor management principles still apply even if there is no actual contractual relationship between the vessel operator and the third party doing the work.

What actions were taken?

  • Review and update of safety management system (SMS) documentation (management of change (MoC) and Contractor Management processes) to ensure this scenario involving third parties is properly dealt with.
  • Additional MoC training provided to vessel management teams.

Members may wish to refer to:

Latest Safety Flashes:

MAIB: Catastrophic engine failure and subsequent fire

MAIB has published Accident Investigation Report 10/2026 into a catastrophic failure of a diesel generator engine on board the vessel Kommandor Susan.

Read more
BSEE: Compressed gas cylinder hazards

BSEE has published Safety Alert 516, relating to potential risks involving compressed gas cylinders.

Read more
MSF: dropped object inside vessel tank

MSF have published Safety Alert 26-05 relating to a tank cleaning machine coming lose and falling within a tank on a vessel.

Read more
Uncontrolled movement of cargo

During offshore cargo operations alongside a rig, a single pipe loaded on deck shifted due to vessel motion and swell conditions.

Read more
Positives – rubber seals on hatches, securing of shackle pins, fuel sample box

A Member reports a few positive findings.

Read more

IMCA Safety Flashes summarise key safety matters and incidents, allowing lessons to be more easily learnt for the benefit of the entire offshore industry.

The effectiveness of the IMCA Safety Flash system depends on the industry sharing information and so avoiding repeat incidents. Incidents are classified according to IOGP's Life Saving Rules.

All information is anonymised or sanitised, as appropriate, and warnings for graphic content included where possible.

IMCA makes every effort to ensure both the accuracy and reliability of the information shared, but is not be liable for any guidance and/or recommendation and/or statement herein contained.

The information contained in this document does not fulfil or replace any individual's or Member's legal, regulatory or other duties or obligations in respect of their operations. Individuals and Members remain solely responsible for the safe, lawful and proper conduct of their operations.

Share your safety incidents with IMCA online. Sign-up to receive Safety Flashes straight to your email.