Poor control of work in dry dock

  • Safety Flash
  • Published on 27 February 2023
  • Generated on 7 June 2026
  • IMCA SF 06/23
  • 1 minute read

A member reports several cases of hot work and other activities being conducted by contractors on a vessel hull during dry dock/maintenance activities, in which the work was not fully or appropriately under the control of vessel management.

What happened?

A member reports several cases of hot work and other activities being conducted by contractors on a vessel hull during dry dock/maintenance activities, in which the work was not fully or appropriately under the control of vessel management.

Examples included mesh cutting, pad-eye welding works on a vessel’s hull, and an empty PTW station.

Vessel hull maintenance work in dry dock: examples included mesh cutting, pad-eye welding works on a vessel’s hull, and an empty PTW station

What went wrong?

Discussion revealed a significant misunderstanding amongst the crew, that activities conducted outside the vessel and in the dry dock itself would be controlled by contractors with no involvement of vessel management.

The potential hazards to vessel and crew were not considered.

Causes

  • Lack of control of third-party activities: contractors working on the vessel hull were left unattended.

  • Lack of Task Risk Assessment: risk assessment was too generic and did not cover task specific issues.

  • Both company standards and procedures and locally applicable safety requirements were not followed.

Latest Safety Flashes:

Three crane incidents

A member reports three separate but related crane incidents involving cranes.

Read more
Finger trapped and injured while working on heavy equipment

A third-party technician suffered a pinch injury to the right index finger.

Read more
Machinery damaged through improper maintenance technique

During an audit on an offshore vessel it was observed that the fuel oil purifier failed to self-discharge.

Read more
Gangway damaged after unauthorised re-installation

During vessel position adjustments, an unattended gangway was caught between berth and vessel, and damaged.

Read more
Some positive findings

Controlled Contractor Induction Process, Effective Gangway Induction and Documentation Control, and Safe Positioning and Good Communication During Lifting Operations.

Read more

IMCA Safety Flashes summarise key safety matters and incidents, allowing lessons to be more easily learnt for the benefit of the entire offshore industry.

The effectiveness of the IMCA Safety Flash system depends on the industry sharing information and so avoiding repeat incidents. Incidents are classified according to IOGP's Life Saving Rules.

All information is anonymised or sanitised, as appropriate, and warnings for graphic content included where possible.

IMCA makes every effort to ensure both the accuracy and reliability of the information shared, but is not be liable for any guidance and/or recommendation and/or statement herein contained.

The information contained in this document does not fulfil or replace any individual's or Member's legal, regulatory or other duties or obligations in respect of their operations. Individuals and Members remain solely responsible for the safe, lawful and proper conduct of their operations.

Share your safety incidents with IMCA online. Sign-up to receive Safety Flashes straight to your email.