Crane wire parted during offshore operations
- Safety Flash
- Published on 17 March 2021
- Generated on 17 March 2025
- IMCA SF 08/21
- 3 minute read
A concrete mattress was being deployed as part of the construction of a pipeline crossing.
What happened?
As the load was swung outboard and before it entered the water, the crane wire parted causing the load to fall to the seabed.
The vessel was in a safe handling zone more than 5 m from subsea assets. The mattress was overboarded when the crane was 17 m from the nearest subsea asset.
The vessel’s main crane was being used to overboard a 6m x 3m x 0.5m concrete mattress, (15.8Te) + lifting frame (1.7Te). Mattress number 6 was deployed in a series of 15, as part of the crossing construction. The crossing was being built to allow a new pipeline to be laid which passed over a buried 3rd party gas pipeline.
During the lift, the load was swung outboard and before it entered the water, the crane wire parted causing the load to fall to the seabed. The mattress and lifting frame were found 6 m away from the buried gas pipeline.
Moment the crane wire parted, causing load to fall to the sea
Parted wire frayed end
What went wrong?
Procedures were not followed, and decisions were made without having the full facts or understanding of operations.
- The vessel main crane was in use during the period following the Magnetic Rope Testing (MRT) when the results were still being evaluated. The test results stated a clear recommendation to cut back the wire.
- The operational limit was set on using 30% of the crane capacity. There was a misunderstanding that the Safe Working Load (SWL) of the crane wire was 60 Te.
- There was no process within the company’s Wire Rope Integrity Management Procedure that provided an option for application of an operational limit to deteriorating wires.
- No management of change process was applied to control the application and understanding of an operational limit, this may have triggered the involvement of the company’s lifting experts ashore.
- No-one on the vessel questioned the operational limit, how it should be interpreted or how it applied to the crane load charts.
- There was no communication of the crane operational limits to the project team, subsequently this was not included in the worksite risk assessment review for the mobilisation and offshore operations.
Actions
- Ensure full communication and engagement between shore-side experts and management on the one hand, and vessel team on the other.
- Any dispensation for wire ropes should be recorded in planned maintenance systems.
- Ensure that mattresses are moved into position from a direction that prevents the mattress being lifted over existing pipelines.
- Reinforce the requirements for the consistent application of the management of change, and technical management of change.
Members may wish to refer to:
Related Safety Flashes
-
IMCA SF 08/15
5 June 2015
-
IMCA SF 11/08
23 June 2008
-
IMCA SF 03/00
1 July 2000
IMCA Safety Flashes summarise key safety matters and incidents, allowing lessons to be more easily learnt for the benefit of the entire offshore industry.
The effectiveness of the IMCA Safety Flash system depends on the industry sharing information and so avoiding repeat incidents. Incidents are classified according to IOGP's Life Saving Rules.
All information is anonymised or sanitised, as appropriate, and warnings for graphic content included where possible.
IMCA makes every effort to ensure both the accuracy and reliability of the information shared, but is not be liable for any guidance and/or recommendation and/or statement herein contained.
The information contained in this document does not fulfil or replace any individual's or Member's legal, regulatory or other duties or obligations in respect of their operations. Individuals and Members remain solely responsible for the safe, lawful and proper conduct of their operations.
Share your safety incidents with IMCA online. Sign-up to receive Safety Flashes straight to your email.