High potential near-miss during back loading

  • Safety Flash
  • Published on 10 July 2009
  • Generated on 4 December 2024
  • IMCA SF 10/09
  • 3 minute read

A Member has reported a high potential near miss incident which occurred during the back loading of a crane boom section from an offshore installation. 

What happened?

Although no injuries were sustained as a result of this incident, two members of the deck crew working on the main deck at this time could potentially have been fatally injured.

A platform supply vessel (PSV) was alongside an offshore installation back loading a section of a crane boom. The crane boom section was first landed on deck with no clearance from adjacent tote tanks. However, it was necessary for deck crew to pass between these tote tanks and the crane boom section to access the crane hook for unlatching. Therefore, the crane operator was asked to move the back loaded crane boom section towards the port side of the main deck to create a safe gap to allow the crew members clear access.

The crane operator moved the back loaded crane boom section 1-2m to port and asked the bridge whether the new position was satisfactory. The bridge then confirmed with the deck crew that this new position was acceptable for them and advised the crane operator accordingly. The crane wire was then slackened and the crew members started to pass between the back loaded crane boom section and the nearby tote tanks to unlatch the crane hook.

Image1 (3)

crane boom section

Image2 (4)

crane boom section and tote tanks

The crane operator then started to heave and raised the back loaded crane boom section by about 1m to approximately waist height whilst personnel were between the crane boom section and the tote tanks. There was very high potential for the two crew members to be crushed between the crane boom section and the tote tanks.

A warning was given on UHF radio to the crew members, who were already aware of the hazardous situation and were already moving to a safe position.

The crane operator then lowered the crane boom section to deck. Weather conditions at the time of the incident were within acceptable working limits, consisting of wind speed 19 knots and significant wave height of between 1.5 and 2.0m.

What were the causes?

Further investigation revealed that:

  • The crane operator lifted the back loaded crane boom section off the deck but failed to effectively communicate his intention to the vessel personnel.

  • The crane operator assumed that the deck was clear of personnel.

Lessons learnt

The following recommendations were made:

  • Crane operators should:

    • Communicate their intentions to all relevant installation and vessel personnel before proceeding with any lifting operation.

    • Ensure that all communications are fully understood and verified by all relevant installation and vessel personnel before proceeding with any lifting operation.

    • Avoid making assumptions and verify that the deck area is clear of all personnel before proceeding with any lifting operation.

Members may also wish to review the following IMCA publications:

  • Guidelines for lifting operations
  • Guidance on operational communications

Latest Safety Flashes:

LTI: Finger injury during emergency recovery of ROV

A worker suffered a serious finger injury when their finger was caught between a crane wire and the recovery hook on an ROV.

Read more
BSEE: recurring hand injuries from alternative cutting devices

The United States Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE) has published Safety Alert 487.

Read more
NTSB: Crane wire failure

The National Transportation Safety Board of the United States (NTSB) published "Safer Seas Digest 2023".

Read more
Hot work performed outside of Permit to Work (PTW) boundary limit

A near miss occurred when a third-party contractor working removed a trip hazard from the vessel main deck, using a cutting torch and grinding disc.

Read more
Vital safety information (height of vehicle) found incorrect

“Height of vehicle” information displayed on a truck, was found to be incorrect.

Read more

IMCA Safety Flashes summarise key safety matters and incidents, allowing lessons to be more easily learnt for the benefit of the entire offshore industry.

The effectiveness of the IMCA Safety Flash system depends on the industry sharing information and so avoiding repeat incidents. Incidents are classified according to IOGP's Life Saving Rules.

All information is anonymised or sanitised, as appropriate, and warnings for graphic content included where possible.

IMCA makes every effort to ensure both the accuracy and reliability of the information shared, but is not be liable for any guidance and/or recommendation and/or statement herein contained.

The information contained in this document does not fulfil or replace any individual's or Member's legal, regulatory or other duties or obligations in respect of their operations. Individuals and Members remain solely responsible for the safe, lawful and proper conduct of their operations.

Share your safety incidents with IMCA online. Sign-up to receive Safety Flashes straight to your email.