Line parting as a result of socket failure during grapnel operations

  • Safety Flash
  • Published on 12 May 2017
  • Generated on 7 November 2025
  • IMCA SF 10/17
  • 2 minute read

A member has reported an incident in which a line parted during grapnel operations. 

What happened?

The incident occurred as grapnels were being recovered during attempts to snag, capture and recover a cable on the seabed.

The end of the rope pulled out of its socket, releasing the rope down the aft deck and overboard. A bar at the stern was damaged and a camera and floodlight were carried overboard.

parted rope on deck

parted rope on deck

resulting damage to Atlantic bar

resulting damage to Atlantic bar

Findings

  • Higher than expected tensions were experienced during the recovery. At the time of the incident rope tension was observed to be 175 kN.

  • During watch handover, the situation regarding high tensions (averaging 130-140 kN) was properly explained.

  • The aft deck and “Snap Back Zones” were kept clear as per normal practice.

  • The “Atlantic bar” was in place on the stern sheave.

  • All ropes had been inspected (as per toolbox talks conducted and recorded) during pay-out and recovery, and there was no sign of excessive degradation to the failed rope or fitting prior to the incident.

  • The recovery of the grapnels at higher than expected tensions, handover and safety briefing in unusual operation conditions, and back deck/snap-back zone safety were all handled diligently and professionally.

  • The rope failed at less than the minimum breaking load (MBL) of the rope, which was 25.0 tonnes:

    • Tensions of up to 200 kN (app. 20 tonnes) had been experienced during the recovery.

    • The working load limit (WLL) of the rope would have been 12.5 tonnes (app. 125 kN) which was adequate for the expected tensions (app. 100-120 kN / 10-12 tonnes).

  • It is possible that the rope socket had gradually degraded over the previous 10 grapnel drives, but with no obvious visual signs of having done so.

Latest Safety Flashes:

Bunker hose obstructing emergency exit

A bunker hose was discovered routed in a way that partially obstructed the stern emergency exit hatch.

Read more
Watertight door and emergency hatch found open at sea

Watertight doors and an emergency hatch were observed open in the ER (Engine Room) during an offshore audit.

Read more
ATSB: Undocumented modification contributed to steam burns

An unplanned pressure release resulted in burn injuries to three crew members.

Read more
Smoke in the battery room

Smoke was observed in the battery room of a vessel alongside.

Read more
Hull crack arising from vibration

A small vessel built of aluminium experienced vibration coming from the propeller.

Read more

IMCA Safety Flashes summarise key safety matters and incidents, allowing lessons to be more easily learnt for the benefit of the entire offshore industry.

The effectiveness of the IMCA Safety Flash system depends on the industry sharing information and so avoiding repeat incidents. Incidents are classified according to IOGP's Life Saving Rules.

All information is anonymised or sanitised, as appropriate, and warnings for graphic content included where possible.

IMCA makes every effort to ensure both the accuracy and reliability of the information shared, but is not be liable for any guidance and/or recommendation and/or statement herein contained.

The information contained in this document does not fulfil or replace any individual's or Member's legal, regulatory or other duties or obligations in respect of their operations. Individuals and Members remain solely responsible for the safe, lawful and proper conduct of their operations.

Share your safety incidents with IMCA online. Sign-up to receive Safety Flashes straight to your email.