Hand injury in medical airlock

  • Safety Flash
  • Published on 24 May 2023
  • Generated on 2 December 2024
  • IMCA SF 13/23
  • 2 minute read

A Life Support Technician (LST) suffered a finger injury whilst operating the medical airlock (“Med-lock”) on a dive chamber

What happened?

A Life Support Technician (LST ) suffered a finger injury whilst operating the medical airlock (“Med-lock”) on a dive chamber. 

The LST was closing the Med-lock door but was unable to rotate the door to the fully closed position, indicating that the hatch needed to rotate further clockwise.

The LST attempted to rotate the hatch counterclockwise in order to be able to open the door and inspect it.

The Med-lock was stiff to rotate. For leverage to assist with rotating the Med-lock, the LST placed his hand on the flat bars that brace the operating wheel.

The hatch moved suddenly and because his hands were on the brace and not on the wheel itself, his hand got pinched between the brace and the Med-lock door hinge plate, causing an injury.

The hatch was stiff, and the LST had his fingers in the wrong place at the wrong time.

What went wrong?

The hatch was stiff, and the LST had his fingers in the wrong place at the wrong time.

Actions

  • Maintain proper lubrication on the door.  Added Med-lock maintenance to planned maintenance programme.
  • Added warning signage to the Med-Lock, for appropriate hand placement, along with clear instructions.
  • Updated the vessel familiarisation to include Med-lock operations and demonstrate operations.

Latest Safety Flashes:

LTI: Finger injury during emergency recovery of ROV

A worker suffered a serious finger injury when their finger was caught between a crane wire and the recovery hook on an ROV.

Read more
BSEE: recurring hand injuries from alternative cutting devices

The United States Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE) has published Safety Alert 487.

Read more
NTSB: Crane wire failure

The National Transportation Safety Board of the United States (NTSB) published "Safer Seas Digest 2023".

Read more
Hot work performed outside of Permit to Work (PTW) boundary limit

A near miss occurred when a third-party contractor working removed a trip hazard from the vessel main deck, using a cutting torch and grinding disc.

Read more
Vital safety information (height of vehicle) found incorrect

“Height of vehicle” information displayed on a truck, was found to be incorrect.

Read more

IMCA Safety Flashes summarise key safety matters and incidents, allowing lessons to be more easily learnt for the benefit of the entire offshore industry.

The effectiveness of the IMCA Safety Flash system depends on the industry sharing information and so avoiding repeat incidents. Incidents are classified according to IOGP's Life Saving Rules.

All information is anonymised or sanitised, as appropriate, and warnings for graphic content included where possible.

IMCA makes every effort to ensure both the accuracy and reliability of the information shared, but is not be liable for any guidance and/or recommendation and/or statement herein contained.

The information contained in this document does not fulfil or replace any individual's or Member's legal, regulatory or other duties or obligations in respect of their operations. Individuals and Members remain solely responsible for the safe, lawful and proper conduct of their operations.

Share your safety incidents with IMCA online. Sign-up to receive Safety Flashes straight to your email.