Both anchors lost due to chain fouling

  • Safety Flash
  • Published on 9 June 2017
  • Generated on 5 December 2024
  • IMCA SF 14/17
  • 2 minute read

A vessel lost both her anchors with one length of cable on the port and two lengths of cable on the starboard side anchor.

What happened?

A vessel had used both anchors whilst waiting for 3 days off the coast. Both chains were fouled and could not be cleared by the vessel.

External assistance was provided but owing to the weather and sea conditions, the anchors could not be cleared, and both chains had to be cut. Attempts at retrieval of the anchors from the seabed were unsuccessful.

The vessel lost both her anchors with one length of cable on the port and two lengths of cable on the starboard side anchor.

1417 3
  • During anchoring and anchorage time, wind speed was less than 15 knots. There were strong diurnal tidal currents approximately 2.5 knots at the anchorage area.

  • Both anchors had to be cut free and arrangements made for the vessel to go alongside for repairs. The vessel was off hire for 12 days.

What went wrong?

  • The Master, based on his previous experience, had the vessel use both anchors to reduce the swinging speed and angle of yaw of the vessel.

  • There was inadequate discussion between the bridge team and anchoring team before anchoring.

  • There was not an effective anchor watch maintained.

Recommendations to prevent recurrence

  • More effective communication and meeting between bridge and anchoring teams before anchoring.

  • More thorough planning and risk assessment before arrival into the anchorage or when deciding to remain at anchor.

Latest Safety Flashes:

LTI: Finger injury during emergency recovery of ROV

A worker suffered a serious finger injury when their finger was caught between a crane wire and the recovery hook on an ROV.

Read more
BSEE: recurring hand injuries from alternative cutting devices

The United States Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE) has published Safety Alert 487.

Read more
NTSB: Crane wire failure

The National Transportation Safety Board of the United States (NTSB) published "Safer Seas Digest 2023".

Read more
Hot work performed outside of Permit to Work (PTW) boundary limit

A near miss occurred when a third-party contractor working removed a trip hazard from the vessel main deck, using a cutting torch and grinding disc.

Read more
Vital safety information (height of vehicle) found incorrect

“Height of vehicle” information displayed on a truck, was found to be incorrect.

Read more

IMCA Safety Flashes summarise key safety matters and incidents, allowing lessons to be more easily learnt for the benefit of the entire offshore industry.

The effectiveness of the IMCA Safety Flash system depends on the industry sharing information and so avoiding repeat incidents. Incidents are classified according to IOGP's Life Saving Rules.

All information is anonymised or sanitised, as appropriate, and warnings for graphic content included where possible.

IMCA makes every effort to ensure both the accuracy and reliability of the information shared, but is not be liable for any guidance and/or recommendation and/or statement herein contained.

The information contained in this document does not fulfil or replace any individual's or Member's legal, regulatory or other duties or obligations in respect of their operations. Individuals and Members remain solely responsible for the safe, lawful and proper conduct of their operations.

Share your safety incidents with IMCA online. Sign-up to receive Safety Flashes straight to your email.