Brazil: diver permanently disabled after decompression illness

  • Safety Flash
  • Published on 14 August 2025
  • Generated on 14 August 2025
  • IMCA SF 14/25
  • 3 minute read

A regional court in São Paulo, Brazil, has upheld the joint conviction of a diving company and an electrical energy company for a work accident suffered by a diver who lost strength in his upper limbs and the ability to move, requiring permanent use of a wheelchair.

The judgement – in Brazilian Portuguese – can be found here.

What happened?

The diver was performing underwater inspection and maintenance work at a depth of 26m. On the day of the incident, the water temperature was low, and the diver was carrying tools necessary for the activity. Upon emerging from the final dive, the diver experienced symptoms of decompression sickness, with severe tingling in the abdomen. Upon reaching the surface, the diver reported feeling unwell and was taken to the hyperbaric chamber for emergency treatment.  While being taken to the hyperbaric chamber the diver lost his vision and movement. Then it was discovered that the hyperbaric chamber was not working properly. 

The diver was then taken for treatment, with oxygen from an improvised chamber, to another diving company, four hours drive away. Upon arrival, there was no doctor present, and the diver has to wait for about an hour for the hyperbaric chamber to be set up.

After ten hours of further hyperbaric treatment, the diver fully recovered his vision, but remained unable to move his legs and arms. Upon returning to his home, he was hospitalized for about 30 days, after which he was released for home physical therapy treatment. The court report noted that as a result of the accident, he developed severe anxiety and depression due to his physical and physiological limitations.

What went wrong?

  • The company failed to comply with any diving or safety regulations.
  • The company hyperbaric chamber wasn’t working properly - the external pressure gauge was inoperative.
  • There was no proper risk assessment or planning for an emergency scenario of this sort.
  • There was no appropriate means of transporting the diver to a new emergency location – a truck had to be used.
  • There was no proper emergency communication:
    • There was no doctor present at the second site.
    • The hyperbaric chamber at the second site was not ready for emergency use – the court noted that there was a “a complete lack of communication between the company and the plaintiff's shelter.”

Lessons to learn

This is the third incident of this type in recent years that IMCA is aware of.  To capture the lessons learned from these incidents, earlier in 2025, IMCA released diving recommended practice IMCA D085 Guidance on deck decompression chamber (DDC) operations for the therapeutic treatment of divers.  This document provides comprehensive guidance on the operation of Deck Decompression Chambers (DDCs) for the therapeutic treatment of divers, emphasising the importance of competence, emergency planning, and adherence to safety standards.

See IMCA D085 Guidance on deck decompression chamber (DDC) operations for the therapeutic treatment of divers

Latest Safety Flashes:

Brazil: diver permanently disabled after decompression illness

Conviction of diving company upheld as work accident suffered by a diver who lost strength in his upper limbs and the ability to move, requiring permanent use of a wheelchair.

Read more
Diver reports unwell post-dive: non-decompression illness

A diver experienced a dizzy spell about one hour after completing a diving operation

Read more
Shore-side crane boom collides with vessel mast

During shipyard lifting operations, the boom of a dock crane made contact with the vessel mast.

Read more
Injury sustained while operating steel lifting magnet

While preparing to transfer steel plates using a steel lifting magnet, a crew person was injured.

Read more
Head Injury in Engine Room

A Chief Engineer sustained a head laceration injury.

Read more

IMCA Safety Flashes summarise key safety matters and incidents, allowing lessons to be more easily learnt for the benefit of the entire offshore industry.

The effectiveness of the IMCA Safety Flash system depends on the industry sharing information and so avoiding repeat incidents. Incidents are classified according to IOGP's Life Saving Rules.

All information is anonymised or sanitised, as appropriate, and warnings for graphic content included where possible.

IMCA makes every effort to ensure both the accuracy and reliability of the information shared, but is not be liable for any guidance and/or recommendation and/or statement herein contained.

The information contained in this document does not fulfil or replace any individual's or Member's legal, regulatory or other duties or obligations in respect of their operations. Individuals and Members remain solely responsible for the safe, lawful and proper conduct of their operations.

Share your safety incidents with IMCA online. Sign-up to receive Safety Flashes straight to your email.