Hydraulic umbilical winch operation – trapped thumb

  • Safety Flash
  • Published on 25 November 2014
  • Generated on 13 December 2024
  • IMCA SF 18/14
  • 3 minute read

A member has reported an incident in which a member of the deck crew injured their thumb while operating a hydraulic umbilical winch. 

What happened?

The vessel deck crew were recovering hydraulic power hoses from subsea onto a hydraulic umbilical winch drum, when the winch operator trapped his thumb between the safety guard and the drum. The operator was wearing the correct personal protective equipment (PPE) for the task. After the incident, the operator removed his glove and noticed a small amount of blood; he reported the incident immediately to his supervisor who in turn contacted the medic. The extent of the injury was a small abrasion to the left hand and the thumbnail had lifted.

Hydraulic winch showing control lever and the guard in which the operator trapped his thumb

Hydraulic winch showing control lever and the guard in which the operator trapped his thumb

Position of operator at time of incident (mock up) -hatched markings on the guards are post-incident

Position of operator at time of incident (mock up) -hatched markings on the guards are post-incident

Varying distance between winch drum and guards

Varying distance between winch drum and guards

Varying distance between winch drum and guards

Varying distance between winch drum and guards

Added strip of additional guarding and safety tape to highlight potential ‘pinch’ points to operators

Added strip of additional guarding and safety tape to highlight potential ‘pinch’ points to operators

Swipe to see next image

Our member’s investigation revealed the following:

  • The operator was not in the correct location for operating the equipment. He was forward of the winch. The winch controls were located at the rear of equipment where adequate guarding was provided.
  • The operator or any other person should not have had physical access to the moving parts (such that an entrapment is possible) regardless of their position. Persons working controls should ensure they were not in a place where they would be exposed to any risk to their health or safety as a result of the operation of those control.
  • Gaps between the safety guards, located on the forward side of the winch, were found to vary in gap size ranging from 5mm to 15mm; it was found that the larger gap increased the risk of entrapment.
  • The incident highlights the importance of having adequate guarding fitted to all equipment. It was found on this occasion that guarding can become a hazard in itself if gaps are not kept to a minimum. Subsequent checks on similar equipment located on other vessels highlighted further issues relating to the guarding provided.
  • This incident highlights the requirement for guarding to be re-assessed on an ongoing basis during maintenance periods and during the completion of risk assessments.

Our member reports that the crew have made suggestions as to how to improve the guarding and these will be implemented onboard. The improvements were to add a strip of additional guarding in an effort to close the 15mm gap and in addition to this apply safety tape (as shown above) to highlight potential ‘pinch’ points to operators.

This is a reminder for all involved in tasks to watch out for pinch points and look out for one another at all times and to stop the job as required.

Latest Safety Flashes:

LTI: Finger injury during emergency recovery of ROV

A worker suffered a serious finger injury when their finger was caught between a crane wire and the recovery hook on an ROV.

Read more
BSEE: recurring hand injuries from alternative cutting devices

The United States Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE) has published Safety Alert 487.

Read more
NTSB: Crane wire failure

The National Transportation Safety Board of the United States (NTSB) published "Safer Seas Digest 2023".

Read more
Hot work performed outside of Permit to Work (PTW) boundary limit

A near miss occurred when a third-party contractor working removed a trip hazard from the vessel main deck, using a cutting torch and grinding disc.

Read more
Vital safety information (height of vehicle) found incorrect

“Height of vehicle” information displayed on a truck, was found to be incorrect.

Read more

IMCA Safety Flashes summarise key safety matters and incidents, allowing lessons to be more easily learnt for the benefit of the entire offshore industry.

The effectiveness of the IMCA Safety Flash system depends on the industry sharing information and so avoiding repeat incidents. Incidents are classified according to IOGP's Life Saving Rules.

All information is anonymised or sanitised, as appropriate, and warnings for graphic content included where possible.

IMCA makes every effort to ensure both the accuracy and reliability of the information shared, but is not be liable for any guidance and/or recommendation and/or statement herein contained.

The information contained in this document does not fulfil or replace any individual's or Member's legal, regulatory or other duties or obligations in respect of their operations. Individuals and Members remain solely responsible for the safe, lawful and proper conduct of their operations.

Share your safety incidents with IMCA online. Sign-up to receive Safety Flashes straight to your email.