Serious injury caused by energy isolation failure

  • Safety Flash
  • Published on 23 August 2018
  • Generated on 23 June 2025
  • IMCA SF 18/18
  • 2 minute read

A yard worker was cleaning debris from underneath a hydraulic pipe.

What happened?

Whilst performing this task, the worker placed his forearm on a hydraulically operated pipe stand. This put the forearm in the line of fire between a lift pocket and a recently modified plate. A serious injury occurred to the worker’s forearm when the pipe stand (see photograph) was lowered by another worker operating the hydraulic lowering mechanism.

worker placed forearm on a hydraulically operated pipe stand

What went wrong? What were the causes?

  • There were no energy isolation routines to prevent the lowering operation from occurring inappropriately, though this was covered and required by our members’ permit to work (PTW) system.
  • There were simultaneous operations (SIMOPS) taking place and these presented risks which had not been properly assessed.
  • There had been modification of this equipment and this had not been fully risk assessed.
  • The task plan was not detailed enough to define all of the hazards in the work area.
  • The injured person did not notice that his task placed him ‘in the line of fire’.

What actions were taken? What lessons were learned?

  • All activities require a risk assessment. Where simultaneous operations have the potential to expose a person to harm, the PTW and isolation process should show that a higher level of control, communication and mitigation is in place.

  • Use the MoC process to ensure that modifications to equipment are assessed and do not introduce a new hazard.

Members may wish to refer to:

Latest Safety Flashes:

NTSB: Vessel crane contact with shore-side crane

The National Transportation Safety Board of the United States (NTSB) has published a report and an investigation.

Read more
Dropped pallet during forklift operation

A pallet containing a load weighing 500kg dropped off a flatbed truck in close proximity to a delivery driver.

Read more
Dropped object hazard: access hatch to the communication dome

During a routine scheduled safety inspection of the main mast, it was discovered that the access hatch to one of the communication domes had fallen off.

Read more
Lock out/Tag out and unauthorised electrical connections/disconnections
Read more
MAIB: Is your Lead-Acid battery safe?

The UK Marine Accident Investigation Branch has published Safety Digest 1/2025, consisting of lessons from recent Marine Accident Reports.

Read more

IMCA Safety Flashes summarise key safety matters and incidents, allowing lessons to be more easily learnt for the benefit of the entire offshore industry.

The effectiveness of the IMCA Safety Flash system depends on the industry sharing information and so avoiding repeat incidents. Incidents are classified according to IOGP's Life Saving Rules.

All information is anonymised or sanitised, as appropriate, and warnings for graphic content included where possible.

IMCA makes every effort to ensure both the accuracy and reliability of the information shared, but is not be liable for any guidance and/or recommendation and/or statement herein contained.

The information contained in this document does not fulfil or replace any individual's or Member's legal, regulatory or other duties or obligations in respect of their operations. Individuals and Members remain solely responsible for the safe, lawful and proper conduct of their operations.

Share your safety incidents with IMCA online. Sign-up to receive Safety Flashes straight to your email.