High potential near miss: Slip on tag line during crane operations

  • Safety Flash
  • Published on 23 August 2017
  • Generated on 28 January 2026
  • IMCA SF 21/17
  • 3 minute read

The Marine Safety Forum (MSF) reports an incident in which a crewman slipped and fell during lifting operations.

The Marine Safety Forum (MSF) reports an incident in which a crewman slipped and fell during lifting operations

What happened?

The incident occurred when a vessel was preparing for cargo transfer to an offshore installation. Two crew were on deck ready to hook a load onto the installation crane. A tag line was attached to the load. As the load was hooked on, one of the seamen was seen to fall to the deck. Crane movement was stopped; the seaman got back on his feet and was uninjured.

The MSF notes that this near miss had a high potential for serious injury:

  • The crane could have lifted the load and it could have collided with the seaman when he had fallen.

  • The crane could have lifted the load and the tag line could have tightened around the seaman’s leg lifting him off the deck.

What went wrong? What were the causes?

After hooking on, the seaman had hold of the middle part of the tag line, and took a step back. He stood on the tag line, tripped and fell.

The MSF notes that industry guidelines (Guidelines for Offshore Marine Operations (GOMO)) state that the use of tag lines should generally be avoided. However, it is recognised that certain conditions may require the use of them – this operation required the use of a tag line due to the relatively very light and fragile nature of the item being transferred.

The guidelines go on to state:

  • All sections of the line, including slack must be kept in front of the body, between the handler and the load.

  • Where two or more persons are handling the same line, ALL must work on the same side of the line. Any slack must be kept in front of the group.

The MSF alert continues: “It is recognised that utilising tag lines with standard cargo units inherently puts distance between the handlers and tag line due to the dimensions involved. In this case, with a small box to be transferred, the tag line was far closer to the handlers and required further care and preparations to avoid conflict.”

What lessons were learned? What actions were taken?

  • The MSF notes that additional pre-planning should have been conducted:

    • Identify which side of the loads the cargo handlers were to work from and the direction in which they will move away.

    • Run the tag line at the opposite side of the load and in the other direction.

  • The risk assessment for deck cargo operations was reviewed particularly with respect to the use of tag lines. The crew was formally briefed (and a record kept thereof) on the contents of the reviewed risk assessment.

  • Additional training in the use of tag lines, particularly when dealing with small or fragile loads, was carried out.

  • Future operations would be more closely monitored from the Bridge.

Members may wish to refer to the following guidelines:

Latest Safety Flashes:

Dropped GRP cover during subsea lifting

A vessel was lifting and relocating a Pipe Line End Manifold (PLEM) GRP Top Cover when the load became detached and dropped approx. 7m.

Read more
Umbilical support frame made contact with passing vehicle on public road

Whilst travelling, a contractor transporting umbilical support frames (USFs) made contact with a passing vehicle as one of the frames dropped down.

Read more
Petrol driven equipment left stored in an emergency generator room

Stored snowblower created an unnecessary fire and explosion risk, as well as blocking access around critical equipment.

Read more
Mechanic got burns due to fire in portable generator

During refuelling, petrol (gasoline) spilled around generator and ignited.

Read more
Some positive findings and good practices

Collection of some positive findings and good practices.

Read more

IMCA Safety Flashes summarise key safety matters and incidents, allowing lessons to be more easily learnt for the benefit of the entire offshore industry.

The effectiveness of the IMCA Safety Flash system depends on the industry sharing information and so avoiding repeat incidents. Incidents are classified according to IOGP's Life Saving Rules.

All information is anonymised or sanitised, as appropriate, and warnings for graphic content included where possible.

IMCA makes every effort to ensure both the accuracy and reliability of the information shared, but is not be liable for any guidance and/or recommendation and/or statement herein contained.

The information contained in this document does not fulfil or replace any individual's or Member's legal, regulatory or other duties or obligations in respect of their operations. Individuals and Members remain solely responsible for the safe, lawful and proper conduct of their operations.

Share your safety incidents with IMCA online. Sign-up to receive Safety Flashes straight to your email.