- Enter the IMCA Awards 2024: We\'re looking for outstanding Safety, Sustainability, and GHG projects.
- IP Code: Mandatory Code enters into force on 1 July. Make sure your company is up to speed with the changes.
- Early Bird tickets available for the IMCA Global Summit 2024. 3-4 December, Utrecht, Netherlands. Members can save £400.
- Discover how we are helping Members reduce emissions: Explore the ProjectGHG hub now.
- Now booking. Join the Lifting and Rigging community at our Technical Seminar in Amsterdam. Thursday 12 September 2024
- Now booking. Underwater Ship Husbandry Seminar. 10 October 2024, Singapore.
Lost ROV incident
What happened?
An ROV got trapped inside the platform structure due to strong tidal current. Subsequently the tether was damaged, and the ROV lost power and telemetry. Attempts to free the slightly positive ROV and pull it carefully out of the structure, but these were not successful. Ultimately, the vessel was needed elsewhere, and the tether was cut and secured to the jacket. Upon returning to the platform the next day, the damaged tether parted during a new rescue attempt. The ROV drifted away from the platform and after a few hours the signal from the ROV’s beacon was lost. A new vessel was summoned to search for the lost ROV with its WROV, but the ROV was not found. The incident occurred during a routine platform jacket inspection.
What went wrong
- Emergency procedures were not detailed enough to cover the scenario that actually occurred; the workboat was not launched in time to secure the ROV in the short interval it was at surface during rescue attempt from the platform;
- The ROV crew was understaffed: There were two operators, but the complexity of the operation warranted a three person team;
- The ROV transponder interrogation rate was set too high – too frequent – resulting in premature exhaustion of the beacon battery.
What was the cause
- Direct cause: The tether parted due to abrasion against the jacket structure, and the ROV was lost with no communication to it;
- Root causes
- Insufficiently detailed instructions, risk assessment of hazards, and emergency recovery procedures;
- Understaffed team.
Corrective action/lessons learned
- Procedures revised to include more details; environmental limitations and more details for a recovery scenario;
- Added a current reading on ROV pilot user interface (GUI).
- Members should be aware of and make full use of IMCA R 004 Guidance for the safe and efficient operation of remotely operated vehicles
Safety Event
Published: 11 January 2023
Download: IMCA SF 02/23
IMCA Safety Flashes
Submit a Report
IMCA Safety Flashes summarise key safety matters and incidents, allowing lessons to be more easily learnt for the benefit of all. The effectiveness of the IMCA Safety Flash system depends on Members sharing information and so avoiding repeat incidents. Please consider adding [email protected] to your internal distribution list for safety alerts or manually submitting information on incidents you consider may be relevant. All information is anonymised or sanitised, as appropriate.
IMCA’s store terms and conditions (https://www.imca-int.com/legal-notices/terms/) apply to all downloads from IMCA’s website, including this document.
IMCA makes every effort to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the data contained in the documents it publishes, but IMCA shall not be liable for any guidance and/or recommendation and/or statement herein contained. The information contained in this document does not fulfil or replace any individual’s or Member's legal, regulatory or other duties or obligations in respect of their operations. Individuals and Members remain solely responsible for the safe, lawful and proper conduct of their operations.