Skip to content

Pipelay technician sustained cut to wrist whilst handling testing equipment

What happened?

During pipelay operations, two non-destructive testing (NDT) technicians were handling a ‘scanner belt’, which is used to connect the automated ultrasonic testing (AUT) scanner to the pipe for testing pipeline welds. On completion of weld testing, the scanner belt (approx. 10kg) was released by one of the technicians, and it ‘slipped off’ the pipe and made contact with the other technician’s wrist. This resulted in a laceration which required 8 stitches. The injured person was wearing full personal protective equipment (PPE). However, the scanner belt made contact with his wrist which was exposed through the gap between the coverall-sleeve and glove.

What went wrong? What were the causes?

  • The equipment design did not account for sharp edges and potential risks during manual handling;
  • Personnel involved in the task did not identify the potential for exposure to sharp edges on equipment, and had perceived the task as ‘routine’;
  • The injured person did not have clear communication or eye contact with the other technician who released the scanner belt. It was also found that language barriers between the technicians contributed to poor communication;
  • The injured person’s coverall sleeve had ‘crept up’ when his arms were reached out, exposing his wrist to contact with equipment.

What actions were taken? What lessons were learned?

  • Review of tasks that involve repetitive manual handling of equipment, to ensure that potential sharp-edge hazards are identified and appropriately controlled;
  • Communicate safe manual handling techniques for tasks that involve more than one person dealing with equipment at the same time. This should include focus on good communications to prevent loss of control;
  • Review of similar tasks and associated PPE controls, to identify potential exposure to forearms or wrists, when arms extending outwards or upwards. Consider use of cut proof arm protection, as shown in images above;
  • Reinforce the need for the continual review of controls associated with ‘routine’ tasks, during toolbox talks (TBT) and hazard inspections.

Members may wish to refer to the following:

Safety Event

Published: 14 December 2018
Download: IMCA SF 27/18

Relevant life-saving rules:
IMCA Safety Flashes
Submit a Report

IMCA Safety Flashes summarise key safety matters and incidents, allowing lessons to be more easily learnt for the benefit of all. The effectiveness of the IMCA Safety Flash system depends on Members sharing information and so avoiding repeat incidents. Please consider adding [email protected] to your internal distribution list for safety alerts or manually submitting information on incidents you consider may be relevant. All information is anonymised or sanitised, as appropriate.

IMCA’s store terms and conditions ( apply to all downloads from IMCA’s website, including this document.

IMCA makes every effort to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the data contained in the documents it publishes, but IMCA shall not be liable for any guidance and/or recommendation and/or statement herein contained. The information contained in this document does not fulfil or replace any individual’s or Member's legal, regulatory or other duties or obligations in respect of their operations. Individuals and Members remain solely responsible for the safe, lawful and proper conduct of their operations.