Damage to main hoist rope on Liebheur 1080/1 crane

  • Safety Flash
  • Published on 1 April 2000
  • Generated on 14 December 2024
  • IMCA SF 02/00
  • 2 minute read

We have recently received the following report

What happened?

During the lifting of a 15te separator vessel at an onshore gas terminal, the crane operator noticed that damage had occurred to the main hoist rope on the crane, resulting in the failure of a number of hoist rope (wire) strands. The vessel was immediately lowered to the ground and an investigation initiated.

On examination of the crane hoist block, it became evident that the main hose rope had been incorrectly ‘reeved’ just prior to the lifting operation, causing the hoist rope to be on the outside on one of the (horizontal) guide pins on the hoist block. As the main hoist rope took the weight of the vessel, the main hoist rope rubbed against the guide pin, causing a partial failure to the main hoist rope and minor damage to the guide pin.

The company found, following investigation:

  1. Changing the crane hoist uses a routine task – failure was due to complacency and familiarity;
  2. There was no formal checklist to confirm adequacy of ‘reeving’ to main hoist rope/block

The company has initiated the following:

  1. Issue of a safety flash across all industry sectors to raise awareness of near miss;
  2. Simple checklist to be developed to ensure ‘reeving’ and other routine alterations to cranes are checked for adequacy prior to use.

Latest Safety Flashes:

LTI: Finger injury during emergency recovery of ROV

A worker suffered a serious finger injury when their finger was caught between a crane wire and the recovery hook on an ROV.

Read more
BSEE: recurring hand injuries from alternative cutting devices

The United States Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE) has published Safety Alert 487.

Read more
NTSB: Crane wire failure

The National Transportation Safety Board of the United States (NTSB) published "Safer Seas Digest 2023".

Read more
Hot work performed outside of Permit to Work (PTW) boundary limit

A near miss occurred when a third-party contractor working removed a trip hazard from the vessel main deck, using a cutting torch and grinding disc.

Read more
Vital safety information (height of vehicle) found incorrect

“Height of vehicle” information displayed on a truck, was found to be incorrect.

Read more

IMCA Safety Flashes summarise key safety matters and incidents, allowing lessons to be more easily learnt for the benefit of the entire offshore industry.

The effectiveness of the IMCA Safety Flash system depends on the industry sharing information and so avoiding repeat incidents. Incidents are classified according to IOGP's Life Saving Rules.

All information is anonymised or sanitised, as appropriate, and warnings for graphic content included where possible.

IMCA makes every effort to ensure both the accuracy and reliability of the information shared, but is not be liable for any guidance and/or recommendation and/or statement herein contained.

The information contained in this document does not fulfil or replace any individual's or Member's legal, regulatory or other duties or obligations in respect of their operations. Individuals and Members remain solely responsible for the safe, lawful and proper conduct of their operations.

Share your safety incidents with IMCA online. Sign-up to receive Safety Flashes straight to your email.