Lost ROV incident

  • Safety Flash
  • Published on 11 January 2023
  • Generated on 5 May 2025
  • IMCA SF 02/23
  • 2 minute read

An ROV got trapped inside the platform structure due to strong tidal current.

What happened?

Subsequently the tether was damaged, and the ROV lost power and telemetry.

Attempts to free the slightly positive ROV and pull it carefully out of the structure, but these were not successful. Ultimately, the vessel was needed elsewhere, and the tether was cut and secured to the jacket.

Upon returning to the platform the next day, the damaged tether parted during a new rescue attempt. The ROV drifted away from the platform and after a few hours the signal from the ROV’s beacon was lost. A new vessel was summoned to search for the lost ROV with its WROV, but the ROV was not found.

The incident occurred during a routine platform jacket inspection.

ROV drifted away from the platform and after a few hours the signal  from the ROV’s beacon was lost

ROV was trapped inside platform structure by strong tidal current

What went wrong?

  • Emergency procedures were not detailed enough to cover the scenario that actually occurred; the workboat was not launched in time to secure the ROV in the short interval it was at surface during rescue attempt from the platform.

  • The ROV crew was understaffed: There were  two operators, but the complexity of the operation warranted a three person team.

  • The ROV transponder interrogation rate was set too high – too frequent – resulting in premature exhaustion of the beacon battery.

What was the cause?

  • Direct cause: The tether parted due to abrasion against the jacket structure, and the ROV was lost with no communication to it.

  • Root causes:

    • Insufficiently detailed instructions, risk assessment of hazards, and emergency recovery procedures.

    • Understaffed team.

Corrective action / lessons learned

Latest Safety Flashes:

BSEE: Nitrogen Cylinder Rupture Causing Worker Injuries and Equipment Damage

The United States Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE) has published Safety Alert 494 relating to a Nitrogen Cylinder rupture which caused injuries and equipment damage.

Read more
Person fractured foot during elevator inspection
Read more
Detergent chemical burn

Leaked detergent resulted in slight chemical burns onboard a vessel.

Read more
Positive findings and good practices

A member highlights some examples of positive findings and good practices on board some of their vessels.

Read more
Hydrogen Sulphide (H2S) detected onboard vessel

Several persons reported to bridge about a smell of septic or rotten eggs that was present all over the vessel. Hydrogen Sulphide (H2S) was suspected.

Read more

IMCA Safety Flashes summarise key safety matters and incidents, allowing lessons to be more easily learnt for the benefit of the entire offshore industry.

The effectiveness of the IMCA Safety Flash system depends on the industry sharing information and so avoiding repeat incidents. Incidents are classified according to IOGP's Life Saving Rules.

All information is anonymised or sanitised, as appropriate, and warnings for graphic content included where possible.

IMCA makes every effort to ensure both the accuracy and reliability of the information shared, but is not be liable for any guidance and/or recommendation and/or statement herein contained.

The information contained in this document does not fulfil or replace any individual's or Member's legal, regulatory or other duties or obligations in respect of their operations. Individuals and Members remain solely responsible for the safe, lawful and proper conduct of their operations.

Share your safety incidents with IMCA online. Sign-up to receive Safety Flashes straight to your email.