High-potential incident: Person struck by Yokohama fender

  • Safety Flash
  • Published on 16 February 2023
  • Generated on 5 December 2024
  • IMCA SF 05/23
  • 2 minute read

While a Yokohama fender was being lifted onboard a vessel in harbour, a crewman came within the line of fire between the fender and bumper bars protecting an electrical services panel.

What happened?

The injured person was struck and injured as the fender moved. He had to move into the line of fire between the fender and the bumper bars in order to release cargo strap sea fastenings from the fender which were attached to the vessel bulwark. At this point the Yokohama fender pivoted and he became trapped between the fender and the bumper bar frame. 

Operations were immediately stopped and the vessel medic was called. The injured person was taken to a shore-side hospital for further examination. After medical examination he was released back to the vessel the same day.

At this point the Yokohama fender pivoted and he became trapped between the fender and the  bumper bar frame. Operations were immediately stopped and the vessel medic  was called. The injured person was taken to a shore-side hospital for further  examination. After medical examination he was released back to the vessel the  same day.

Fig. 1: Yokohama fender and bumper bar positioning

At this point the Yokohama fender pivoted and he became trapped between the fender and the  bumper bar frame. Operations were immediately stopped and the vessel medic  was called. The injured person was taken to a shore-side hospital for further  examination. After medical examination he was released back to the vessel the  same day

Fig. 2: Cargo strap sea fastening still attached to Yokohama fender

What went wrong?

  • In this particular instance, this Yokohama fender was not accessed from the rear, as was usual, but from a position that put the crewman in the line of fire.

  • Neither the vessel task plan nor the Task Risk Assessment (TRA) for mooring operations included the lifting and installation of Yokoyama Fenders, nor did they take into account the line of fire risk.

  • Human factors and risk perception – the injured person did not wait for the Yokoyama fender to stabilise before going into the line of fire. The incident occurred very fast; there was no time for the other members of the team to react and intervene.
• Human factors and risk perception - the injured person did not wait for the  Yokoyama fender to stabilise before going into the line of fire. The incident  occurred very fast; there was no time for the other members of the team to  react and intervene.

Fig. 3: Post Incident re-enactment – where the person stood at the time of the incident

Lessons learned

  • Reviewed how Yokohama fenders are stored on board vessels, with reference to reducing and controlling Line of Fire risks in the task of securing and relocating fenders.

  • Reviewed vessel task plan and risk assessments for mooring operations, to ensure inclusion of:

    • lifting and installation of Yokohama fenders where appropriate

    • Line of Fire, personnel positioning, entrapment risks and escape routes.

  • Heightened focus on controls, barriers, and risk management where Line of Fire risks have been identified.

  • Considered regular “After Task” reviews as a key part of task planning to focus on learning, safety, and human/performance improvement.

  • Ensured that the obligation and expectation to exercise the Stop Work Authority is clearly communicated and understood by all parties. Always ensure an area is safe before entering after an All Stop has been called.

Latest Safety Flashes:

LTI: Finger injury during emergency recovery of ROV

A worker suffered a serious finger injury when their finger was caught between a crane wire and the recovery hook on an ROV.

Read more
BSEE: recurring hand injuries from alternative cutting devices

The United States Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE) has published Safety Alert 487.

Read more
NTSB: Crane wire failure

The National Transportation Safety Board of the United States (NTSB) published "Safer Seas Digest 2023".

Read more
Hot work performed outside of Permit to Work (PTW) boundary limit

A near miss occurred when a third-party contractor working removed a trip hazard from the vessel main deck, using a cutting torch and grinding disc.

Read more
Vital safety information (height of vehicle) found incorrect

“Height of vehicle” information displayed on a truck, was found to be incorrect.

Read more

IMCA Safety Flashes summarise key safety matters and incidents, allowing lessons to be more easily learnt for the benefit of the entire offshore industry.

The effectiveness of the IMCA Safety Flash system depends on the industry sharing information and so avoiding repeat incidents. Incidents are classified according to IOGP's Life Saving Rules.

All information is anonymised or sanitised, as appropriate, and warnings for graphic content included where possible.

IMCA makes every effort to ensure both the accuracy and reliability of the information shared, but is not be liable for any guidance and/or recommendation and/or statement herein contained.

The information contained in this document does not fulfil or replace any individual's or Member's legal, regulatory or other duties or obligations in respect of their operations. Individuals and Members remain solely responsible for the safe, lawful and proper conduct of their operations.

Share your safety incidents with IMCA online. Sign-up to receive Safety Flashes straight to your email.