Near miss: Crewman struck on head by crane hook (Marine Safety Forum)

  • Safety Flash
  • Published on 5 April 2019
  • Generated on 14 December 2024
  • IMCA SF 06/19
  • 3 minute read

The Marine Safety Forum (MSF) has published Safety Alert 18-26, in which an AB was struck on the head by a crane hook during routine deck cargo transfer operations.

What happened?

A platform supply vessel (PSV) was carrying out the routine deck cargo operations at an offshore installation.  Two crew on deck were routinely hooking on and off cargo as it was being discharged and back loaded to and from the vessel.  Shift change was due, so after discharge of the cargo carrying unit (CCU), the crew moved to the forward end of the cargo deck for shift change.  However, before departing from deck, there was no routine check of the next CCU to ensure it was ready for discharge; this critical step was overlooked.

The crane was landing the previous CCU on the installation deck whilst the crew completed their handover on the PSV’s deck.  The oncoming crew were waiting in the ‘safe area’ for the crane hook to return to vessel in order to attach the next CCU.  As the crane hook was being lowered, the new crew noticed that the lifting bridle was snagged; their attention was immediately drawn away from the approaching crane hook as they freed the lifting bridle.  This took only a matter of seconds; they then stood back to look up for the crane hook, which had continued its descent to the deck unchecked by the crane operator.

As one of the crew looked up at the crane hook, it struck his hard hat before continuing its descent to the vessel deck.  Luckily, his hard hat did the job and he was uninjured.

What went wrong? What were the causes?

Several critical factors were identified from this incident:

  • There was a shift change as soon as the previous CCU had been discharged.

  • Neither shift ensured that the lifting bridle on the next CCU was clear and ready to hook.

  • When the new crew noticed the lifting bridle had snagged, their attention was drawn away from the approaching crane hook.

  • Crew did not contact the crane operator to advise him to stop lowering the crane hook whilst they handled the snagged lifting bridle, therefore the crane operator did not realise that their attention was elsewhere.

The root cause was deemed to be failure to follow established routine and best practice procedures:

  • There was a breakdown in communication between the crew and the crane operator; the crane operator should have been advised by radio and/or hand signals to stop lowering the crane hook.

  • Crew should use available time when the previous CCU is discharged to inspect the next CCU and ensure that it is ready for hooking onto the crane hook when lowered.

  • If extra time is needed for shift change, ‘stop the job’ and take the required time for handover.

What actions were taken?

  • Investigation found that neither the vessel operators’ nor the crane operators’ procedures provided clear, detailed guidance on how cargo transfer operations should be conducted. Both parties were requested to review and update their procedures.

  • The client imposed step-by-step instructions to be followed by all involved in cargo transfer operations, in order to allow the operators time to update their procedures accordingly.

The full safety alert can be found on the MSF website.

Latest Safety Flashes:

LTI: Finger injury during emergency recovery of ROV

A worker suffered a serious finger injury when their finger was caught between a crane wire and the recovery hook on an ROV.

Read more
BSEE: recurring hand injuries from alternative cutting devices

The United States Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE) has published Safety Alert 487.

Read more
NTSB: Crane wire failure

The National Transportation Safety Board of the United States (NTSB) published "Safer Seas Digest 2023".

Read more
Hot work performed outside of Permit to Work (PTW) boundary limit

A near miss occurred when a third-party contractor working removed a trip hazard from the vessel main deck, using a cutting torch and grinding disc.

Read more
Vital safety information (height of vehicle) found incorrect

“Height of vehicle” information displayed on a truck, was found to be incorrect.

Read more

IMCA Safety Flashes summarise key safety matters and incidents, allowing lessons to be more easily learnt for the benefit of the entire offshore industry.

The effectiveness of the IMCA Safety Flash system depends on the industry sharing information and so avoiding repeat incidents. Incidents are classified according to IOGP's Life Saving Rules.

All information is anonymised or sanitised, as appropriate, and warnings for graphic content included where possible.

IMCA makes every effort to ensure both the accuracy and reliability of the information shared, but is not be liable for any guidance and/or recommendation and/or statement herein contained.

The information contained in this document does not fulfil or replace any individual's or Member's legal, regulatory or other duties or obligations in respect of their operations. Individuals and Members remain solely responsible for the safe, lawful and proper conduct of their operations.

Share your safety incidents with IMCA online. Sign-up to receive Safety Flashes straight to your email.