Lifting operations: Wire hoist rope failure

  • Safety Flash
  • Published on 28 April 2020
  • Generated on 6 July 2026
  • IMCA SF 14/20
  • 2 minute read

What happened?

When conducting a standard lifting operation of a 24.5te storage vessel and lifting frame (approximately 36% of the crane 70te maximum rated capacity) the wire hoist rope (WHR) failed causing the load, main block and length of wire to drop approximately 3 m to the wharf. No personnel were injured.

The maintenance, inspection, and testing regime applied to the WHR was consistent with general industry practice, guidelines, and company requirements and included third-party examination and certification. However, localised internal corrosion of the wire hoist rope (WHR) went undetected.

The metallurgical examination conducted on the wire hoist rope after the incident concluded that the wire hoist rope failed by a ductile overload mechanism following corrosion damage during service, particularly of the core wires. The lack of protective zinc galvanised coating on the wire hoist rope was a significant contributor to the eventual failure.

1 2

What lessons were learned?

  • Reliance on ‘industry practice and guidelines’ alone when maintaining, testing and inspecting wire hoist ropes may not be sufficient. Frequency of use, intended loads, environmental conditions, time in service, and criticality of the wire hoist rope should be specifically considered.
  • Implement crane wire maintenance regimes for specific individual wire rope types using original equipment manufacturer input coupled together with a competent person’s assessment of the risks, giving due regard for the operating environment and intended use of the crane/wire rope.
  • Establish criteria to determine when and how magnetic wire rope (MRT) testing should be applied (frequency, triggers, length of wire).

Members may wish to refer to:

Latest Safety Flashes:

Severe injuries following falling off a freight container

A truck driver slipped and fell from a container leading to severe injury.

Read more
Watertight doors left open

Watertight doors in the Engine Room and fire doors in the accommodation were observed open on several occasions during a management audit.

Read more
Crew member injured during mooring operation

A crew member used their foot to slow down a running mooring rope, causing them to fall to the deck.

Read more
Worker got something in the eye – safety glasses slightly askew

A workers safety glasses were slightly offset (creating a small gap) which allowed a fragment of hot slag to get in his eye.

Read more
Fire in tumble dryer

A fire was discovered within one of the vessel laundry dryers.

Read more

IMCA Safety Flashes summarise key safety matters and incidents, allowing lessons to be more easily learnt for the benefit of the entire offshore industry.

The effectiveness of the IMCA Safety Flash system depends on the industry sharing information and so avoiding repeat incidents. Incidents are classified according to IOGP's Life Saving Rules.

All information is anonymised or sanitised, as appropriate, and warnings for graphic content included where possible.

IMCA makes every effort to ensure both the accuracy and reliability of the information shared, but is not be liable for any guidance and/or recommendation and/or statement herein contained.

The information contained in this document does not fulfil or replace any individual's or Member's legal, regulatory or other duties or obligations in respect of their operations. Individuals and Members remain solely responsible for the safe, lawful and proper conduct of their operations.

Share your safety incidents with IMCA online. Sign-up to receive Safety Flashes straight to your email.